Woody plants having improved growth characteristics and method for making the same

ABSTRACT

The present invention pertains to a novel and extensive analytical platform for selecting genes with a possible commercial phenotype from a large group of candidate genes identified using tools in bioinformatics, data from EST sequencing and DNA array. An aspect of the invention provides a method of producing a transgenic plant having an increased growth compared to its wild type. The method comprises altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene specifically expressed during different phases of wood formation. Further aspects of the invention provide a plant cell or plant progeny of a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant polynucleotide according to the invention. Other aspects pertain a DNA construct comprising a nucleotide sequence of the invention and a plant cell or plant progeny comprising the DNA construct.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. National Phase patent application Ser. No. 12/518,086, with an international filing date of Dec. 4, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,018,448, which claims priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/SE2007/050939, filed Dec. 4, 2007, which claims priority to European Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2006/011855, filed Dec. 8, 2006, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in the present disclosure in their entirety.

SUBMISSION OF SEQUENCE LISTING AS ASCII TEXT FILE

The content of the following submission on ASCII text file is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety: a computer readable form (CRF) of the Sequence Listing (file name: 616562002510SEQLIST.TXT, date recorded: Apr. 24, 2015, size: 82 KB).

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of molecular biology and relates to a method for improving plant growth characteristics. More specifically, the invention relates to a method for phenotypically modifying plants and transgenic plants having altered expression of a gene specifically expressed during different phases of wood formation resulting in a modified growth phenotype. The invention also provides constructs useful in the method of the invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

At present, the primary objectives of forest-tree engineering and molecular breeding are to improve wood quality and yield. The global demand for wood products is growing at around 1.7% annually, and this increase in wood consumption is occurring despite the fact that the maximum sustainable rate of harvesting from the worlds forests has already been reached or exceeded. Therefore, there is a need for increases in plantation wood production worldwide. Forestry plantations may also have advantages as a carbon sequestration crop in response to increasing atmospheric CO₂. Similarly, increased production of biomass from non-woody plants is desirable, for instance in order to meet the demand for raw material for energy production. Modification of specific processes during cell development in higher species is therefore of great commercial interest, not only when it comes to improving the properties of trees, but also other plants.

Plant growth by means of apical meristems results in the development of sets of primary tissues and in lengthening of the stem and roots. In addition to this primary growth, tree species undergo secondary growth and produce the secondary tissue “wood” from the cambium. The secondary growth increases the girth of stems and roots.

Sterky et al. 1998 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998 (95), 13330-13335) have published the results of a large-scale gene discovery program in two poplar species, comprising 5,629 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from the wood forming tissues of Populus tremula L. x tremuloides Michx. and Populus trichocarpa ‘Trichobel.’ These ESTs represented a total of 3,719 unique transcripts for the two cDNA libraries and putative functions could be assigned to 2,245 of these transcripts. The authors state that the EST data presented will be valuable in identifying genes involved in the formation of secondary xylem and phloem in plants, but fail to give clear directions as to how the identification could be performed. The Sterky et al. 1998 paper also revealed the existence of a very large number of ESTs with unknown or uncertain functions.

In the prior art (e.g. Sterky et al. 1998) libraries were constructed from stem tissue isolated from actively growing trees. A cambial region library was prepared from a mix of tissues, including the developing xylem, the meristematic cambial zone, and developing and mature phloem of P. Tremula X tremuloides Michx. These cambial tissues were obtained by peeling the bark and scraping both exposed surfaces with a scalpel. A developing-xylem library was prepared from Populus trichocarpa Tricobel. These tissues were obtained by peeling the bark and scraping the exposed xylem side. Using such methods it is only possible to build three different libraries representing the whole cambial region, the developing-xylem and the phloem region (made from scraping the exposed bark). The prior art compared the expression of genes in the cambial-region with the genes expressed in the developing xylem tissue. The experiment only allowed a crude comparison due to the limits imposed by the tissue preparation protocol. The tissue used for the developing xylem library would contain tissues from expanding xylem cells through to late xylem development.

One problem remaining is how to identify the potentially most important genes and to relate these to specific developmental stages and final properties of the cell. Another problem is how to identify hitherto unknown genes, related to specific cell types and/or functions in the plant. Finally, a particular problem is how to find the specific genes involved in cell division, cell expansion, cell wall synthesis, apoptosis and programmed cell death and other important processes involved in determining tree growth and wood properties.

Hertzberg et al. 2001 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001 (98), 14372-14737), and Schrader et al. 2005 (Plant Cell, (16), 2278-2292) have used transcript profiling to reveal a transcriptional hierarchy for thousands of genes during xylem development as well as providing expression data that can facilitate further elucidation of many genes with unknown function (White et al. 1999 (Science 1999 (286) 2187-2184); Aharoni et al. 2000 (Plant Cell 2000 (12) 647-662). This is however technically demanding in woody plants such as trees. Hertzberg et al. and Schrader et al. have studied the developing secondary xylem of poplar, which is highly organized with easily recognized and distinct boundaries between the different developmental stages. Wood formation is initiated in the vascular cambium. Cambial derivatives develop into xylem cells through the processes of division, expansion, secondary wall formation, lignification and, finally, programmed cell death. The large physical size of the vascular meristem in trees offers a unique possibility to obtain samples from defined developmental stages by tangential cryo sectioning (Uggla et al. 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996 (93), 9282-9286). To determine the steady state mRNA levels at specific stages during the ontogeny of wood formation in Populus tremula x tremuloides (hybrid aspen) 30 μm thick sections through the wood development region were sampled and subsequently analyzed using several spotted cDNA-microarray (Schena et al. 1995 Science 1995 (270) 467-470) consisting of up to 20.000 unique ESTs from hybrid aspen.

Although it is obvious that results from EST programs, genome sequencing and expression studies using DNA array technologies can verify where and when a gene is expressed it is rarely possible to clarify the biological and/or technical function of a gene only from these types of analytical tools. In order to analyze and verify the gene function a functional characterization must be performed, e.g. by gene inactivation and/or gene over-expression. However, in order to be able to identify genes with interesting and most often unexpected commercial features, there is a need for novel analytical platforms evaluating candidate genes based on multiple criteria.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention pertains to a novel and extensive analytical platform for selecting genes with a possible commercial phenotype from a large group of candidate genes identified using tools in bioinformatics, data from EST sequencing and DNA array. The analytical platform is concentrated on analyses of growth behavior based on a combination of multiple criteria. The invention provides a method for producing a transgenic plant by changing the expression of one or more genes selected from a group of genes which fulfil said criteria.

Thus, an aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a transgenic plant having an increased growth compared to its wild type, comprising altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene specifically expressed during different phases of wood formation.

In a particular embodiment of the invention, the at least one gene is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of said gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 5% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maxiumum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum maxiumum height growth rate (MMHGR);         and/or     -   b) a difference of 5% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 18% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 18% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maxiumum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization Weibulls         Rika S NPK 7-1-5 diluted 1 to 100 with a group of wild-type         plants grown under identical conditions;         wherein the maxiumum height growth rate is defined as the slope         of a linear function fitted over four consecutive height data         points, a height growth rate value was calculated for data point         1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and a maxim         height growth rate value being computed for each plant.

A number of genes analyzed using the novel analytical platform show interesting and most often unexpected commercial features. Thus, another aspect of the invention relates to a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant polynucleotide (DNA construct) comprising a nucleotide sequence capable of altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene specifically expressed during wood formation phases, wherein the at least one gene is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of said gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 5% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maxiumum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum maxiumum height growth rate (MMHGR);         and/or     -   b) a difference of 5% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 18% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 18% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maxiumum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization with N         84 g/l, P1 2 g/l, K 56 g/l, with a group of wild-type plants         grown under identical conditions;         wherein the maximum height growth rate is defined by calculating         the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive         height data points, a height growth rate value is calculated for         data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and         the maximum height growth rate value is finally selected from         the growth rate values for each plant.

Another aspect of the invention provides a plant cell or plant progeny of a transgenic plant according to the invention and comprising a recombinant polynucleotide.

A further aspect of the invention provides wood produced by a transgenic plant having the characteristics described above.

Still another aspect of the invention provides a DNA construct comprising at least one sequence as described as described above.

Finally, one aspect of the invention provides a plant cell or plant progeny comprising the DNA construct according to the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 A-1D shows the different phases of wood formation, wherein FIG. 1A is a cross section of a hybrid aspen stem stained with Toluidine blue. Black bars indicate the location of the sampled tissues. The phloem sample was included in order to give a low-resolution picture of the gene expression in the other tissue derived from the cambium. FIG. 1B is a schematic representation of different cell-types and stages during vascular development. Bars depict timing and extent of the different developmental stages and the appearance of the major cell wall components. FIG. 1C shows a hierarchical cluster analysis of 1791 selected genes with differential expression in the sampled tissues. The colour scale at the bottom depicts fold change between samples. FIG. 1D (I-X) shows groups of genes with different differential expression patterns, expression ratios in log 2 scale. The samples are indicated at the bottom of the figure.

FIG. 2 shows the expression patterns for the selected genes, from the xylem differentiation data. Nine principal examples of genes selected from the Hertzberg et al (2001) data set for functional analysis in Hybrid aspen. The same samples and figure as in FIG. 1D, The graph shows the expression pattern of those genes over the xylem differentiation zone. Expression ratios are on log scale.

FIG. 3 shows the expression patterns for the selected genes from the meristem experiment data. Six principal examples of genes selected from the Schrader et al (2004) data set for functional analysis in Hybrid aspen. The same samples and figure as in FIG. 1D. The graphs show the expression pattern of those genes over the cambial zone. Expression data is from the B series from Schrader et al 2004. Expression values are on log scale, for an explanation of the normalization and data preparation (See Schrader et al 2004);

FIG. 4 shows an example of a height growth curve with four different data point linear regression lines shown, the black regression line shows the maximum height growth rate;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Definitions

Prior to discussing the present invention in further details, the following terms and conventions will first be defined:

The term “transgenic plant” refers to a plant that contains genetic material, not found in a wild type plant of the same species, variety or cultivar. The genetic material may include a transgene, an insertional mutagenesis event (such as by transposon or T-DNA insertional mutagenesis), an activation tagging sequence, a mutated sequence, a homologous recombination event or a sequence modified by chimeraplasty. Typically, the foreign genetic material has been introduced into the plant by human manipulation. The term also refers to plants in which genetic material has been inserted to function as a selection marker. Examples of such selectable markers include kanamycin, hygromycin, phosphoinotricin, chlorsulfron, methotrexate, gentamycin, spectinomycin, imidazolinones, d-aminoacids and glyphosate.

In the present context the term “growth” includes primary growth, including a lengthening of the stem and roots, as well as secondary growth of a plant, including production of secondary tissue, “wood”, from the cambium and an increase in the girth of stems and roots. Thus, the expression “increased growth” relates in the present context to an increase growth of a transgenic plant relative to the wild-type plant from which the transgenic plant is derived, when grown under the same growth conditions. As described below, a transgenic plant is characterized to have an increased growth if the plant meets at least one of the “growth difference selection criteria” as defined in the below Examples.

The term “phenotype” refers in the present context to an individual plant's total physical appearance, such as growth. Examples of different growth phenotypes used in the present context are listed in the below table 1.2 and comprise e.g. a phenotype named “AFH” which refers to an average final height of the wild type population and each construction group population, or “AFD” average final diameter of the wild type population and each construction group population.

In the context of the present invention the term “phases of wood formation” refers to stages of wood formation, such as cell division and cell expansion, as defined in: Wilson, B. F., Wodzicki, T. J. and Zhaner, R. (1966) Differentiation of cambial derivates: Proposed terminology. Forest Science 12, pp 438-440.

When discussing a gene that is specifically expressed during different phases of wood formation, the term “specifically expressed” is used as a designation of genes the expression of which is increased during wood formation phases. It will be understood that the expression of said genes during phases of wood formation may be increased by 10% or more, such as by 15% or more, 20% or more, 25% or more, 30% or more, 40% or more, 50% or more, 75% or more, 100% or more, 200% or more, 300% or more, 400% or more, 500% or more, 700% or more or 1000% or more.

The term “gene” broadly refers to any segment of DNA associated with a biological function. Genes include coding sequences and/or regulatory sequences required for their expression. Genes also include non-expressed DNA nucleic acid segments that, e.g., form recognition sequences for other proteins (e.g., promoter, enhancer, or other regulatory regions). Genes can be obtained from a variety of sources, including cloning from a source of interest or synthesizing from known or predicted sequence information, and may include sequences designed to have desired parameters.

The term “RNA interference” or “RNAi” refers generally to a process in which a double-stranded RNA molecule or a short hairpin RNA changes the expression of a nucleic acid sequence with which they share substantial or total homology.

The term “RNAi down-regulation” refers to the reduction in the expression of a nucleic acid sequence mediated by one or more RNAi species. The term “RNAi species” refers to a distinct RNA sequence that elicits RNAi.

The term “photoperiod” refers to the daily cycle of light and darkness.

The terms “nucleic acid construct”, “DNA construct” and “vector” refer to a genetic sequence used to transform plants or other organisms. The nucleic acid construct or DNA construct may be able to direct, in a transformed plant the expression of a protein or a nucleic acid sequence, such as for example an antisense RNA. Typically, such a nucleic acid construct or DNA construct comprises at least a coding region for a desired gene product or a desired nucleic acid product operably linked to 5′ and 3′ transcriptional regulatory elements. In some embodiments, such nucleic acid constructs or DNA constructs are chimeric, i.e. consisting of a mixture of sequences from different sources. However, non-chimeric nucleic acid constructs or DNA constructs may also be used in the present invention.

The term “recombinant” when used with reference, e.g., to a cell, nucleotide, vector, protein, or polypeptide typically indicates that the cell, nucleotide, or vector has been modified by the introduction of a heterologous (or foreign) nucleic acid or the alteration of a native nucleic acid, or that the protein or polypeptide has been modified by the introduction of a heterologous amino acid, or that the cell is derived from a cell so modified. Recombinant cells express nucleic acid sequences (e.g., genes) that are not found in the native (non-recombinant) form of the cell or express native nucleic acid sequences (e.g. genes) that would be abnormally expressed under-expressed, or not expressed at all. The term “recombinant” when used with reference to a cell indicates that the cell replicates a heterologous nucleic acid, or expresses a peptide or protein encoded by a heterologous nucleic acid. Recombinant cells can contain genes that are not found within the native (non-recombinant) form of the cell. Recombinant cells can also contain genes found in the native form of the cell wherein the genes are modified and re-introduced into the cell by artificial means. The term also encompasses cells that contain a nucleic acid endogenous to the cell that has been modified without removing the nucleic acid from the cell; such modifications include those obtained by gene replacement, site-specific mutation, and related techniques.

The term “nucleic acid sequence” refers to a polymer of deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides in either single- or double-stranded form. Unless specifically limited, the term encompasses nucleic acid sequences containing known analogues of natural nucleotides which have similar binding properties as the reference nucleic acid and are metabolized in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides. Unless otherwise indicated, a particular nucleic acid sequence also implicitly encompasses conservatively modified variants thereof (e.g., degenerate codon substitutions) and complementary sequences and as well as the sequence explicitly indicated.

A “polynucleotide” is a nucleic acid sequence comprising a plurality of polymerized nucleotide residues, e. g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized nucleotide residues, optionally at least about 30 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 50 consecutive nucleotides. In many instances, a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation initiation site, 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like. The polynucleotide can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA. The polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone. The polynucleotide can be e. g. genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like. The polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientation.

The term “polypeptide” is used broadly to define linear chains of amino acid residues, including occurring in nature and synthetic analogues thereof.

In the context of the present invention “complementary” refers to the capacity for precise pairing between two nucleotides sequences with one another. For example, if a nucleotide at a certain position of an oligonucleotide is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleotide at the corresponding position of a DNA or RNA molecule, then the oligonucleotide and the DNA or RNA are considered to be complementary to each other at that position. The DNA or RNA strand are considered complementary to each other when a sufficient number of nucleotides in the oligonucleotide can form hydrogen bonds with corresponding nucleotides in the target DNA or RNA to enable the formation of a stable complex.

In the present context the expressions “complementary sequence” or “complement” therefore also refer to nucleotide sequences which will anneal to a nucleic acid molecule of the invention under stringent conditions.

The term “stringent conditions” refers to general conditions of high, weak or low stringency.

The term “stringency” is well known in the art and is used in reference to the conditions (temperature, ionic strength and the presence of other compounds such as organic solvents) under which nucleic acid hybridisations are conducted. With “high stringency” conditions, nucleic acid base pairing will occur only between nucleic acid fragments that have a high frequency of complementary base sequences, as compared to conditions of “weak” or “low” stringency. Suitable conditions for testing hybridization involve pre-soaking in 5×SSC and pre-hybridizing for 1 hour at ˜40° C. in a solution of 20% formamide, 5×Denhardt's solution, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, and 50 mg of denatured sonicated calf thymus DNA, followed by hybridization in the same solution supplemented with 100 mM ATP for 18 hours at ˜40° C., followed by three times washing of the filter in 2×SSC, 0.2% SDS at 40° C. for 30 minutes (low stringency), preferred at 50° C. (medium stringency), more preferably at 65° C. (high stringency), even more preferably at ˜75° C. (very high stringency). More details about the hybridization method can be found in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor, 1989.

The terms “hybridization” and “hybridize” are used broadly to designate the association between complementary or partly complementary nucleic acid sequences, such as in a reversal of the process of denaturation by which they were separated. Hybridization occurs by hydrogen bonding, which may be Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen, reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding, etc., between complementary nucleoside or nucleotide bases. The four nucleobases commonly found in DNA are G, A, T and C of which G pairs with C, and A pairs with T. In RNA T is replaced with uracil (U), which then pairs with A. The chemical groups in the nucleobases that participate in standard duplex formation constitute the Watson-Crick face. Hoogsteen showed a couple of years later that the purine nucleobases (G and A) in addition to their Watson-Crick face have a Hoogsteen face that can be recognised from the outside of a duplex, and used to bind pyrimidine oligonucleotides via hydrogen bonding, thereby forming a triple helix structure.

A “subsequence” or a “fragment” is any portion of an entire sequence. Thus, a fragment or subsequence refers to a sequence of amino acids or nucleic acids that comprises a part of a longer sequence of amino acids (e.g. polypeptide) or nucleic acids (e.g. polynucleotide), respectively.

In the present context, the homology between two amino acid sequences or between two nucleotide sequences is described by the parameter “sequence identity”.

The term “sequence identity” indicates a quantitative measure of the degree of homology between two amino acid sequences or between two nucleic acid sequences of equal length. If the two sequences to be compared are not of equal length, they must be aligned to give the best possible fit, allowing the insertion of gaps or, alternatively, truncation at the ends of the polypeptide sequences or nucleotide sequences. The sequence identity can be calculated as:

$\left( \frac{\left( {N_{ref} - N_{dif}} \right)100}{N_{ref}} \right)$

wherein N_(dif) is the total number of non-identical residues in the two sequences when aligned and wherein N_(ref) is the number of residues in one of the sequences. Hence, the DNA sequence AGTCAGTC will have a sequence identity of 75% with the sequence AATCAATC (N_(dif)=2 and N_(ref)=8). A gap is counted as non-identity of the specific residue(s), i.e. the DNA sequence AGTGTC will have a sequence identity of 75% with the DNA sequence AGTCAGTC (N_(dif)=2 and N_(ref)=8).

With respect to all embodiments of the invention relating to nucleotide sequences, the percentage of sequence identity between one or more sequences may also be based on alignments using the clustalW software (www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalW/index.html) with default settings. For nucleotide sequence alignments these settings are: Alignment=3Dfull, Gap Open 10.00, Gap Ext. 0.20, Gap separation Dist. 4, DNA weight matrix: identity (IUB). Alternatively, the sequences may be analysed using the program DNASIS Max and the comparison of the sequences may be done at www.paralign.org/. This service is based on the two comparison algorithms called Smith-Waterman (SW) and ParAlign. The first algorithm was published by Smith and Waterman (1981) and is a well established method that finds the optimal local alignment of two sequences The other algorithm, ParAlign, is a heuristic method for sequence alignment; details on the method published in Rognes (2001). Default settings for score matrix and Gap penalties as well as E-values were used.

The phrase “substantially identical” or “substantial identity” in the context of two nucleic acids or polypeptides, refers to two or more sequences or sub-sequences that have at least about 60%, 70%, 75%, preferably 80% or 85%, more preferably 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, or greater nucleotide or amino acid residue percent identity, respectively, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by visual inspection. In certain aspects, the substantial identity exists over a region of amino acid sequences of at least about 50 residues in length, such as, at least about 100, 110, 120, 125, 130, 135, 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, or 165 amino acid residues. In certain aspects, substantial identity exists over a region of nucleic acid sequences of at least about 150 nucleic acid residues, such as at least about 200, 250, 300, 330, 360, 375, 400, 425, 450, 460, 480, 500, 600, 700, 800 such as at least about 900 nucleotides or such as at least about 1 kb, 1.1 kb, 1.2 kb, 1.3 kb, 1.4 kb, 1.5 kb, 1.6 kb, 1.7 kb, 1.8 kb, 1.9 kb, 2 kb, 2.1 kb, 2.2 kb, 2.3 kb, 2.4 kb, 2.5 kb, 2.6 kb, 2.7 kb, 2.8 kb, 2.9 kb or such as at least about 3 kb. In some aspects, the amino acid or nucleic acid sequences are substantially identical over the entire length of the polypeptide sequence or the corresponding coding region.

The term “Conservative substitutions” are within the group of basic amino acids (arginine, lysine and histidine), acidic amino acids (glutamic acid and aspartic acid), polar amino acids (glutamine and asparagine), hydrophobic amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine and methionine), aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine), and small amino acids (glycine, alanine, serine and threonine). Amino acid substitutions which do not generally alter the specific activity are known in the art and are described, for example, by H. Neurath and R. L. Hill, 1979, In, The Proteins, Academic Press, New York. The most commonly occurring exchanges are Ala/Ser, Val/Ile, Asp/Glu, Thr/Ser, Ala/Gly, Ala/Thr, Ser/Asn, Ala/Val, Ser/Gly, Tyr/Phe, Ala/Pro, Lys/Arg, Asp/Asn, Leu/Ile, Leu/Val, Ala/Glu, and Asp/Gly as well as these in reverse.

The term “conservatively substituted variant” as used herein refers to a variant of a nucleotide sequence comprising one or more conservative substitutions.

Generally and in the present context, the term “silent substitution” refers to a base substitution which does not affect the sense of a codon and thus has no effect on polypeptide structure. As the skilled person will know silent substitutions are possible because of the degeneracy of the genetic code.

The term “conserved domain” refers to a sequence of amino acids in a polypeptide or a sequence of nucleotides in DNA or RNA that is similar across multiple species. A known set of conserved sequences is represented by a consensus sequence. Amino acid motifs are often composed of conserved sequences. Additionally, the term “conserved sequence” refers to a base sequence in a nucleic acid sequence molecule or an amino acid sequence in a protein that has remained essentially unchanged throughout evolution. A “consensus sequence” is defined in terms of an idealized sequence that represents the base most often present at each position in a nucleic acid sequence or the amino acid most often present at each position in a protein. A “consensus sequence” is identified by aligning all known examples of a nucleic acid sequence or a protein so as to maximise their sequence identity. For a sequence to be accepted as a consensus sequence each particular base or amino acid must be reasonably predominant at its position and most of the sequences must be related to the consensus by only few substitutions, such as 1 or 2.

The term “promoter,” as used herein, refers to a region of sequence determinants located upstream from the start of transcription of a gene and which are involved in recognition and binding of RNA polymerase and other proteins to initiate and modulate transcription. Promoters useful in plants need not be of plant origin. A “basal promoter” is the minimal sequence necessary for assembly of a transcription complex required for transcription initiation. Basal promoters frequently include a TATA box” element usually located between 15 and 35 nucleotides upstream from the site of initiation of transcription. Basal promoters also sometimes include a CCAAT box” element (typically a sequence CCAAT) and/or a GGGCG sequence, usually located between 40 and 200 nucleotides, preferably 60 to 120 nucleotides, upstream from the start site of transcription.

Promoters referred to herein as “constitutive promoters” actively promote transcription under most, but not necessarily all, environmental conditions and states of development or cell differentiation. Examples of constitutive promoters include the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S transcript initiation region and the 1′ or 2′ promoter derived from TDNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and other transcription initiation regions from various plant genes, such as the maize ubiquitin-1 promoter, known to those of skill. Organ-specific promoters may be, for example, a promoter from storage sink tissues such as seeds, potato tubers, and fruits, or from metabolic sink tissues such as meristems, a seed specific promoter such as the glutelin, prolamin, globulin, or albumin promoter from rice, a Vicia faba promoter from the legumin B4 and the unknown seed protein gene from Vicia faba, a promoter from a seed oil body protein, the storage protein napA promoter from Brassica napus, or any other seed specific promoter known in the art, e.g., as described in WO 91/14772. Furthermore, the promoter may be a leaf specific promoter such as the rbcs promoter from rice or tomato, the chlorella virus adenine methyltransferase gene promoter, or the aldP gene promoter from rice, or a wound inducible promoter such as the potato pin2 promoter.

An “inducible promoter” in the context of the present invention refers to a promoter which is regulated under certain conditions, such as light, chemical concentration, protein concentration, conditions in an organism, cell, or organelle, etc. An example of an inducible promoter is the HSP promoter and the PARSK1, the promoter from the Arabidopsis gene encoding a serine-threonine kinase enzyme and which is induced by dehydration, abscissic acid and sodium chloride. In essence, expression under the control of an inducible promoter is “switched on” or increased in response to an applied stimulus. The nature of the stimulus varies between promoters and may include the above environmental factors. Whatever the level of expression is in the absence of the stimulus, expression from any inducible promoter is increased in the presence of the correct stimulus.

As used herein, the term “tissue specific” refers to a characteristic of a particular tissue that is not generally found in all tissues, or may be exclusive found in a tissue of interest. In the present application, “tissue specific” is used in reference to a gene regulatory element (promoter or promoter plus enhancer and/or silencer), the gene it encodes, or the polypeptide product of such a gene. In the context of a gene regulatory element or a “tissue specific promoter”, the term means that the promoter (and also other regulatory elements such as enhancer and/or silencer elements) directs the transcription of a linked sequence in a cell of a particular lineage, tissue, or cell type, but is substantially inactive in cells or tissues not of that lineage, tissue, or cell type. A tissue specific promoter useful according to the invention is at least 5-fold, 10-fold, 25-fold, 50 fold, 100-fold, 500-fold or even 1,000 times more active in terms of transcript production in the particular tissue than it is in cells of other tissues or in transformed or malignant cells of the same lineage. In the context of a gene or the polypeptide product of a gene, the term tissue specific means that the polypeptide product of the gene is detectable in cells of that particular tissue or cell type, but not substantially detectable in certain other cell types. Particularly relevant tissue specific promoters include promoter sequences specifically expressed or active in the xylem forming tissue in a plant. Examples of such promoters are the Lmp1, Lmx2, Lmx3, Lmx4 and Lmx5 promoters, described in WO2004097024.

A “terminator sequence” refers to a section of genetic sequence that marks the end of gene or operon on genomic DNA for transcription. Terminator sequences are recognized by protein factors that co-transcriptionally cleave the nascent RNA at a polyadenylation signal, halting further elongation of the transcript by RNA polymerase. A nucleic acid is “operably linked” when it is placed into a functional relationship with another nucleic acid sequence. For instance, a promoter or enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if it increases the transcription of the coding sequence. Operably linked means that the DNA sequences being linked are typically contiguous and, where necessary to join two protein coding regions, contiguous and in reading frame. However, since enhancers generally function when separated from the promoter by several kilobases and intronic sequences may be of variable lengths, some polynucleotide elements may be operably linked but not contiguous.

In the context of the present invention the terms “transformation” and “transforming” are used interchangeably and as synonyms to “transfecting” and “transfection”, respectively, to refer to the process of introducing DNA into a cell. The DNA constructs, including at least a portion of the gene or promoter of interest, can be introduced into host cells, which as stated previously, can be individual cells, cells in culture, cells as part of a host organism, a fertilized oocyte orgametophyte or an embryonic cell. By the term “introduction” when used in reference to a host cell is meant to refer to standard procedures known in the art for introducing recombinant vector DNA into the target host cell. Such procedures include, but are not limited to, transfection, infection, transformation, natural uptake, electroporation, biolistics and Agrobacterium.

By “regenerable cell” is meant a plant cell from which a whole plant can be regenerated. It will be understood that the regenerable cell is a cell that has maintained its genetic potential, also known in the art as “totipotency”. It will further be understood that the regenerable cells, when grown in culture, may need the appropriate stimuli to express the total genetic potential of the parent plant.

Method of Producing a Transgenic Plant

Functional Analyses for Selection of Genes

Candidate genes for use in changing and/or modifying the phenotype of a plant with regard to growth may be identified using prior art procedures, e.g. as described in Hertzberg et al. (2001) and Schrader et al. (2004). Candidate genes involved in regulating growth may also for example be identified among transcription factors with special features identified using prior art knowledge. Such identification of candidate genes is known in the art as being important in order to maximize the positive output of a functional genomics program directed against growth related properties/functions. Accordingly, a first aspect of the present invention provides a method of producing a transgenic plant having an increased growth compared to its wild type, comprising altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene specifically expressed during wood formation phases.

While based on the targeting of such candidate genes, the present invention provides a method of producing a transgenic plant which includes the targeting of a gene that has been further selected by a novel approach to functional analyses.

According to one embodiment of this aspect, the at least one gene is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of said gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 5% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maxiumum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum maxiumum height growth rate (MMHGR);         and/or     -   b) a difference of 5% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 18% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 18% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maxiumum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization with N         84 g/l, P1 2 g/l, K 56 g/l, with a group of wild-type plants         grown under identical conditions; and         wherein the maximum height growth rate is defined by calculating         the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive         height data points, a height growth rate value is calculated for         data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and         the maximum height growth rate value is finally selected from         the growth rate values for each plant.

A fertilizer containing 84 gram of N per litre, 2 gram of P1 per litre, and 56 gram of K per litre is currently available under the trade name Weibulls Rika S NPK7-1-5. The composition of this fertilizer is as follows (all in g/l): N tot=84, N0₃=55, NH₄=29, P=12, K=56, Mg=7.2, S=7.2, B=0.18, Cu=0.02, Fe=0.84, Mn=0.42, Mo=0.03, Zn=0.13.

In a further embodiment a more stringent set of criteria are applied. According to this embodiment the at least one gene is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of said gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 8% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maxiumum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum maxiumum height growth rate (MMHGR);         and/or     -   b) a difference of 8% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 22% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 22% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maxiumum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization with N         84 gill P1 2 g/l, K 56 g/l, with a group of wild-type plants         grown under identical conditions;         wherein the maximum height growth rate is defined by calculating         the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive         height data points, a height growth rate value is calculated for         data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and         the maximum height growth rate value is finally selected from         the growth rate values for each plant.

An advantage of the present invention is that it provides an extremely sensitive analytical platform for evaluating candidate genes involvement in determining growth characteristics.

While gene evaluation methods have previously been based the evaluation of phenotypes according to a single criterion, such as plant height or diameter, the present method allows a phenotype to be characterised on the basis of multiple criteria, including average final height, maximum final height, average maximum height growth rare, and maximum of maximum height growth rate. Use of this analytical platform allows the identification and selection of new target genes to be used in methods for generating plants having increased growth using. Using a more simple approach these target genes would not have been considered to be involved determination of growth characteristics or they would only have been considered to play a marginal role in generating the growth phenotype.

In specific embodiments of the invention advantageous plant phenotypes are generated by modifying, relative to the corresponding wild-type plant, the expression level of candidate genes that have been evaluated and selected according to the above criteria. According to these aspects a method is provided which comprises altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   a) a nucleotide sequence from SEQ ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60;         such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54,         55, 56, 57, 58, 60;     -   b) a nucleotide sequence being at least 60% identical to a         nucleotide sequence from SEQ ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such         as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55,         56, 57, 58, 60.     -   c) a subsequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of a) or         b).

The sequences specified by sequence ID numbers 1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60. represent partial sequences of the candidate genes as cloned from hybrid aspen. As the skilled person will understand, additional sequence from these genes 5′ as well as 3′ to the sequence described in SEQ ID NOs:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60.

is readily achievable using conventional cloning techniques, such as those described in Sambrook et al.

Nucleic Acid Constructs

According to more particular embodiments of the invention, the method comprises the step of providing a nucleic acid construct, such as a recombinant DNA construct, comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   d) a nucleotide sequence comprising a sequence selected from SEQ         ID NO: SEQ ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such as SEQ ID NO: 1,         2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60,     -   e) a complementary nucleotide sequence of a nucleotide sequence         of d);     -   f) a sub-sequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of d) or         e);     -   g) a nucleic acid sequence being at least 60% identical to any         one of the sequences in d), e) and f); and     -   h) a nucleotide sequence which hybridizes under stringent         conditions to a nucleotide sequence of d), e) or f).

In further embodiments of the invention the nucleic acid sequence in c) or g) is at least 65% identical to any one of the sequences in a), c), d), e) or f), such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to any one of the sequences in a), c), d), e) or f).

In preferred embodiments of this aspect of the invention the nucleotide sequence of a) is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 56, 57 and 58.

A variety of methods exist in the art for producing the nucleic acid sequences and nucleic acid/DNA constructs of the invention. Procedures for identifying and isolating DNA clones are well known to those of skill in the art, and are described in, e. g. Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.), Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y., 1989. Alternatively, the nucleic acid sequences of the invention can be produced by a variety of in vitro amplification methods adapted to the present invention by appropriate selection of specific or degenerate primers. Examples of protocols sufficient to direct persons of skill through in vitro amplification methods, including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the ligase chain reaction (LCR), Qbeta-replicase amplification and other RNA polymerase mediated techniques (e. g., NASBA), e. g., for the production of the homologous nucleic acids of the invention are found in Sambrook, supra.

Alternatively, nucleic acid constructs of the invention can be assembled from fragments produced by solid-phase synthesis methods. Typically, fragments of up to approximately 100 bases are individually synthesized and then enzymatically or chemically ligated to produce a desired sequence, e. g., a polynucletotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor. For example, chemical synthesis using the phosphoramidite method is well known to the skilled person. According to such methods, oligonucleotides are synthesized, purified, annealed to their complementary strand, ligated and then optionally cloned into suitable vectors.

As mentioned, the above described sequences are from hybrid aspen. As the skilled person will understand, homologues of the described sequences may be isolated from other species, non-limiting examples of which include acacia, eucalyptus, hornbeam, beech, mahogany, walnut, oak, ash, hickory, birch, chestnut, alder, maple, sycamore, ginkgo, palm tree, sweet gum, cypress, Douglas fir, fir, sequoia, hemlock, cedar, juniper, larch, pine, redwood, spruce and yew, apple, plum, pear, banana, orange, kiwi, lemon, cherry, grapevine, fig, cotton, bamboo, switch grass, red canary grass and rubber plants. Useful homologues of the described sequences may also be isolated from hardwood plants from the Salicaceae family, e.g. from the salix and populus genus. Members of this geneus are known by their common names: willow, poplar and aspen.

In particular, the nucleotide sequence according to the invention comprises a sequence selected from those of SEQ ID NOs: 18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60 or a complementary nucleotide sequence thereof.

It will be apparent that the sub-sequences or fragment in c) or f) as described above comprises at least 15 nucleotides, such as at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, at least 25 nucleotides, e.g. at least 30 nucleotides, at least 35 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 45 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 55 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 65 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 75 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 85 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 95 nucleotides, or such as at least 100 nucleotides. In certain embodiments, the sub-sequences or fragment in c) or f) as described above comprises at least about 150 nucleic acid residues, such as at least about 200, 250, 300, 330, 360, 375, 400, 425, 450, 460, 480, 500, 600, 700, 800 such as at least about 900 nucleotides or such as at least about 1 kb, 1.1 kb, 1.2 kb, 1.3 kb, 1.4 kb, 1.5 kb, 1.6 kb, 1.7 kb, 1.8 kb, 1.9 kb, 2 kb, 2.1 kb, 2.2 kb, 2.3 kb, 2.4 kb, 2.5 kb, 2.6 kb, 2.7 kb, 2.8 kb, 2.9 kb or such as at least about 3 kb.

In particular, the method according to the present invention may comprise a step of providing a nucleic acid construct, such as a recombinant DNA construct, comprising a nucleotide sequence which relative to the particular sequences described, comprises conservative variations altering only one, or a few amino acids in the encoded polypeptide may also be provided and used according to the present invention. Accordingly, it is within the scope of the invention to provide and use a recombinant DNA construct comprising a nucleotide sequence which encodes a polypeptide comprising a conservatively substituted variant of a polypeptide of a).

Sequence alterations that do not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide are termed “silent” substitutions. With the exception of the codons ATG and TGG, encoding methionine and tryptophan, respectively, any of the possible codons for the same amino acid can be substituted by a variety of techniques, e. g., site-directed mutagenesis, available in the art. Accordingly, the present invention may also provide a recombinant nucleic acid construct, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a silent substitution in a nucleotide sequence.

In certain further embodiments of the invention, the sub-sequences or fragments have at least 65% sequence identity to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a) or d), such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a) or d).

Approaches to Obtaining Altering the Level of a Gene Product

This invention is used by lowering or in some instances abolishing the expression of certain genes, non limiting examples how this can be done are presented here. The nucleic acid construct or recombinant DNA construct as described above may be used for the identification of plants having altered growth characteristics as compared to the wild-type. Such plants may for instance be naturally occurring variants or plants that have been modified genetically to exhibit altered growth properties. For such purposes the nucleic acid construct or recombinant DNA construct according to the invention may be used e.g. as a probe in conventional hybridization assays or as a primer for specific amplification of nucleic acid fragments.

Although the main part of this invention is how a down regulation of the gene products gives the desired effect. It also shows that changing the expression of the genes presented here can be used to modify the desired properties, this is another way to look at the data, and an effect of this view is that also increasing the gene products within the plant is a way to modify the desired trait. There are different ways to increase the levels of a gene product, these are described below in parallel with the ways to down regulate a gene product below.

These genes could also be used as targets for marker assisted breeding because changes in the gene regulatory sequences can give changes in the expression patterns and changes in the coding sequences can give changes in the gene function, and we know that manipulating these genes gives changes in the desired traits.

In addition, the nucleic acid construct or recombinant DNA construct according to the invention may be used for the purpose of gene replacement in order to modify the respective plant growth phenotype.

Suppression of endogenous gene expression can for instance be achieved using a ribozyme. Ribozymes are RNA molecules that possess highly specific endoribonuclease activity. The production and use of ribozymes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,071 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,543,508. While antisense techniques are discussed below, it should be mentioned that synthetic ribozyme sequences including antisense RNAs can be used to confer RNA cleaving activity on the antisense RNA, such that endogenous mRNA molecules that hybridize to the antisense RNA are cleaved, which in turn leads to an enhanced antisense inhibition of endogenous gene expression.

Vectors in which RNA encoded by a relevant gene homologue is over-expressed can also be used to obtain co-suppression of a corresponding endogenous gene, e. g., in the manner described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020 to Jorgensen. Such co-suppression (also termed sense suppression) does not require that the entire gene sequence be introduced into the plant cells, nor does it require that the introduced sequence be exactly identical to the endogenous sequence of interest. However, the suppressive efficiency will be enhanced as specificity of hybridization is increased, e. g., as the introduced sequence is lengthened, and/or as the sequence similarity between the introduced sequence and the endogenous transcription factor gene is increased.

Vectors expressing an untranslatable form of gene, e. g., sequences comprising one or more stop codons, or nonsense mutation, can also be used to suppress expression of an endogenous transcription factor, thereby reducing or eliminating its activity and modifying one or more traits. Methods for producing such constructs are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,021. In particular, such constructs can be made by introducing a premature stop codon into the gene.

One way of performing targeted DNA insertion is by use of the retrovirus DNA integration machinery as described in WO2006/078431. This technology is based on the possibility of altering the integration site specificity of retroviruses and retrotransposons integrase by operatively coupling the integrase to a DNA-binding protein (tethering protein). Engineering of the integrase is preferably carried out on the nucleic acid level, via modification of the wild type coding sequence of the integrase by PCR. The integrase complex may thus be directed to a desired portion or be directed away from an undesired portion of genomic DNA thereby producing a desired integration site characteristic.

Another such technology is the “Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes”, which is a non-transgenic way to alter gene function in a targeted way. This approach involves mutating a plant with foe example ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and later locating the individuals in which a particular desired gene has been modified. The technology is described for instance in Slade and Knauf, Transgenic Res. 2005 April; 14(2):109-15 and Henikoff, Till and Comai, Plant Physiol. 2004 June; 135(2):630-6.

Another method for abolishing the expression of a gene is by insertion mutagenesis using the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. After generating the insertion mutants, the mutants can be screened to identify those containing the insertion in an appropriate gene. Plants containing a single transgene insertion event at the desired gene can be crossed to generate homozygous plants for the mutation.

As will be apparent to the skilled person, a plant trait can also be modified by using the cre-lox system. A plant genome can be modified to include first and second lox sites that are then contacted with a Cre recombinase. Provided that the lox sites are in the same orientation, the intervening DNA sequence between the two sites will be excised. If the lox sites are in the opposite orientation, the intervening sequence is inverted.

The polynucleotides and polypeptides of this invention can also be expressed in a plant in the absence of an expression cassette by manipulating the activity or expression level of the endogenous gene by other means, for example, by ectopically expressing a gene by T-DNA activation tagging (Ichikawa et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science 274: 982-985). This method entails transforming a plant with a gene tag containing multiple transcriptional enhancers and once the tag has inserted into the genome, expression of a flanking gene coding sequence becomes deregulated. In another example, the transcriptional machinery in a plant can be modified so as to increase transcription levels of a polynucleotide of the invention (See, e. g., PCT Publications WO 96/06166 and WO 98/53057 which describe the modification of the DNA binding specificity of zinc finger proteins by changing particular amino acids in the DNA binding motif).

Antisense Suppression of Expression

However, the recombinant DNA construct, comprising a nucleotide sequence as described above is particularly useful for sense and anti-sense suppression of expression, e. g., to down-regulate expression of a particular gene, in order to obtain a plant phenotype with increased growth. That is, the nucleotide sequence of the invention, or sub-sequences or anti-sense sequences thereof, can be used to block expression of naturally occurring homologous nucleic acids. Varieties of traditional sense and antisense technologies are known in the art, e. g., as set forth in Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997), Antisense Technology: A Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University, Oxford, England. The objective of the antisense approach is to use a sequence complementary to the target gene to block its expression and create a mutant cell line or organism in which the level of a single chosen protein is selectively reduced or abolished.

For example, a reduction or elimination of expression (i. e., a “knock-out”) of a gene product in a transgenic plant in order to produce a plant phenotype characterised by increased growth can be obtained by introducing an antisense construct corresponding to the polypeptide of interest as a cDNA. For antisense suppression, a cDNA encoding the gene product or part thereof is arranged in reverse orientation (with respect to the coding sequence) relative to the promoter sequence in the expression vector. The introduced sequence need not be the full length cDNA or gene, and need not be identical to the cDNA or gene found in the plant type to be transformed. Typically, the antisense sequence need only be capable of hybridizing to the target gene or RNA of interest. Thus, where the introduced sequence is of shorter length, a higher degree of homology to the endogenous transcription factor sequence will be needed for effective antisense suppression. While antisense sequences of various lengths can be utilized, preferably, the introduced antisense sequence in the vector will range from 15-30 nucleotides in length, such as from 16-28 nucleotides, from 17-26 nucleotides or from 18-24 nucleotides in length, and improved antisense suppression will typically be observed as the length of the antisense sequence increases. Preferably, the length of the antisense sequence in the vector will be greater than 100 nucleotides. Transcription of an antisense construct as described results in the production of RNA molecules that are the reverse complement of mRNA molecules transcribed from the endogenous gene in the plant cell.

For more elaborate descriptions of anti-sense regulation of gene expression as applied in plant cells reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,065, the content of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

RNA Interference

Gene silencing that is induced by double-stranded RNA is commonly called RNA interference or RNAi. RNA interference is a molecular mechanism in which fragments of double-stranded ribonucleic acid (dsRNA) interfere with the expression of a particular gene that shares a homologous sequence with the dsRNA. The process that is mediated by the same cellular machinery that processes microRNA, known as the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The process is initiated by the ribonuclease protein Dicer, which binds and cleaves exogenous double-stranded RNA molecules to produce double-stranded fragments of 20-25 base pairs with a few unpaired overhang bases on each end. The short double-stranded fragments produced by Dicer, called small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), are separated and integrated into the active RISC complex. If one part of an RNA transcript is targeted by an RNAi molecule or construct, the whole transcript is down-regulated.

The catalytically active components of the RISC complex are known in animals as argonaute proteins, endonucleases which mediate the siRNA-induced cleavage of the target mRNA strand. Because the fragments produced by Dicer are double-stranded, they could each in theory produce a functional siRNA; however, only one of the two strands—known as the guide strand—binds the argonaute protein and leads to gene silencing. The other anti-guide strand or passenger strand is degraded as a RISC substrate during the process of RISC activation. The strand selected as the guide tends to be the strand whose 5′ end is more stable, but strand selection is not dependent on the direction in which Dicer cleaves the dsRNA before RISC incorporation.

RNA interference as used in the laboratory often involves perfectly base-paired dsRNA molecules that induce mRNA cleavage. After integration into the RISC, siRNAs base pair to their target mRNA and induce the RISC component protein argonaute to cleave the mRNA, thereby preventing it from being used as a translation template. To be stable in vitro or in vivo the sequence of a siLNA or siRNA compound need not be 100% complementary to its target nucleic acid. The fact that the siRNA compounds (and the siLNA compounds as described below) are complementary and specifically hybridisable to their target molecules simply imply that the siRNA (or siLNA) compounds bind sufficiently strong and specific to the target molecule to provide the desired interference with the normal function of the target whilst leaving the function of non-target mRNAs unaffected.

It is known that LNA monomers incorporated into oligos will induce RNA like structure of the oligo and of the hybrid that it may form. It is also shown that LNA residues will direct that structure to DNA residues incorporated towards the 3′-end of the LNA incorporation and to a lesser extend towards the 5′-end. The consequence of this is that it is possible to modify RNA strands with DNA monomers and if one or more LNA residues flank the DNA monomers they too will attain RNA structure. Therefore, DNA and LNA can replace RNA monomers and despite of that the oligo will attain an overall RNA like structure. DNA is much cheaper, easier to synthesize and more nuclease stable than RNA and such modification will therefore improve the overall use and applicability of siRNA's.

Organisms vary in their cells' ability to take up foreign dsRNA and use it in the RNAi pathway. In plants, however, the gene silencing caused by RNAi can spread from cell to cell in plants, and the effects of RNA interference are thus both systemic and heritable in plants

For more elaborate descriptions of RNAi gene suppression in plants by transcription of a dsRNA reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,559, US Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0168707 A1, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/423,143 (see WO 98/53083), Ser. No. 09/127,735 (see WO 99/53050) and Ser. No. 09/084,942 (see WO 99/61631), all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

In the particular embodiments by which the present invention is exemplified the sub-sequences or fragments in c) comprise the sequences of SEQ ID NOs:18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60.

Construction of Vectors

In general, those skilled in the art are well able to construct vectors of the present invention and design protocols for recombinant gene expression. For further details on general protocols for preparation of vectors reference is made to: Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual: 2nd edition, Sambrook et al, 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. The promoter used for the antisense gene may influence the level, timing, tissue, specificity, or inducibility of the antisense inhibition. Furthermore, antisense can manipulate its specificity by selecting either unique regions of the target gene or regions where it shares homology to other related genes.

Generally, suppression of a gene by RNA interference can be achieved using a recombinant DNA construct having a promoter operably linked to a DNA element comprising a sense and anti-sense element of a segment of genomic DNA or cDNA of the gene, e.g., a segment of at least about 25 nucleotides, such as at least 30, at least 40, at least 50, at least 75, at least 100, at least 200, at least 300, at least 400, at least 500, or at least 750 nucleotides, or such as at least 1 kb, such as at least 1.5 kb, at least 2 kb, at least 2.5 kb, os such as at least 3 kb, where the sense and anti-sense DNA components can be directly linked or joined by an intron or artificial DNA segment that can form a loop when the transcribed RNA hybridizes to form a hairpin structure.

In pertinent embodiments of the invention the nucleic acid construct, or recombinant DNA construct, further comprising a constitutive, inducible, or tissue specific promoter operably linked to said nucleotide sequence.

An example of nucleic acid construct, or recombinant DNA construct has a promoter driving the transcription of a DNA fragment from a target gene followed of an shorter sequence that are present in an inverted repeat, this together triggering the RNAi response of the target gene. Such a construct has been described by Brummel D. A. et al. Plant Journal 2003, 33, pages 793-800).

In another example, an artificial microRNA is constructed were a promoter drives the expression of an RNA molecule mimicking the function of an microRNA and the sequence setting the gene specificity is recominantly introduced. (see Niu et al, 2006. Expression of artificial microRNAs in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers virus resistance. Science 2006, vol 24, No. 11 pp 1420-1428) The microRNA can be of natural occurrence and only overexpressed.

In a particular embodiment of the present invention the nucleic acid construct, or recombinant DNA construct, further comprises a strong constitutive promoter in front of a transcribed cassette consisting of part of the target gene followed by a plant functional intron followed by the same part of the target gene in reverse orientation, the transcribed cassette is followed by an terminator sequence. The preferred vector is of such type with one of the nucleotide sequence of the invention is inserted in inverted repeat orientation.

In a presently preferred embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid construct, or recombinant DNA construct, comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 47.

The presently preferred nucleic acid construct for RNAi based approaches is a vector termed pK7GWIWG2(I). The vector is described in: Gateway vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plants transformation, Karimi, M. et al., Trends In plant Sciences, Vol 7 no 5 pp 193-195. The same basic kind of vector were earlier described in Wesley S. V. et al., Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant Journal 2001, 27, pages 581-590.

A person trained in the art will understand that any sequence being part of the genes, or the corresponding mRNA's presented here can be used to down regulate the levels of such mRNA. In the case the presented sequence does not represent the full mRNA, the full mRNA can be cloned with various techniques known to a person skilled in the arts, such as the techniques described in Sambrook et al. A recent resource important for finding more sequences associated with the mRNA transcripts of a populus genes is the published genome of Populus tricocarpa and the resources described in Tuskan et al 2006 (G. A Tuskan et al, 2006. The genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus tricocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science vol 313 No. 5793, pages 1596-1604.

Transformation of Plant Cells

In accordance with the present invention, the method comprise the further step of transforming regenerable cells of a plant with said nucleic acid construct or recombinant DNA construct and regenerating a transgenic plant from said transformed cell. When introducing the above DNA construct or vector into a plant cell, certain considerations must be taken into account, well known to those skilled in the art. The nucleic acid to be inserted should be assembled within a construct that contains effective regulatory elements that will drive transcription, as described above. There must be available a method of transporting the construct into the cell. Once the construct is within the cell, integration into the endogenous chromosomal material either will or will not occur.

Transformation techniques, well known to those skilled in the art, may be used to introduce the DNA constructs and vectors into plant cells to produce transgenic plants, in particular transgenic trees, with improved plant growth.

A person of skills in the art will realise that a wide variety of host cells may be employed as recipients for the DNA constructs and vectors according to the invention. Non-limiting examples of host cells include cells in embryonic tissue, callus tissue type I, II, and III, hypocotyls, meristem, root tissue, tissues for expression in phloem.

As listed above, Agrobacterium transformation is one method widely used by those skilled in the art to transform tree species, in particular hardwood species such as poplar. Production of stable, fertile transgenic plants is now a routine in the art. Other methods, such as microprojectile or particle bombardment, electroporation, microinjection, direct DNA uptake, liposome mediated DNA uptake, or the vortexing method may be used where Agrobacterium transformation is inefficient or ineffective, for example in some gymnosperm species.

Alternatively, a combination of different techniques may be employed to enhance the efficiency of the transformation process, e.g. bombardment with Agrobacterium coated microparticles or microprojectile bombardment to induce wounding followed by co-cultivation with Agrobacterium.

It will be understood, that the particular choice of a transformation technology will be determined by its efficiency to transform certain plant species as well as the experience and preference of the person practising the invention with a particular methodology of choice. It will be apparent to the skilled person that the particular choice of a transformation system to introduce nucleic acid into plant cells is not essential to or a limitation of the invention, nor is the choice of technique for plant regeneration.

Following transformation, transgenic plants are preferably selected using a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the transformation vector. Typically, such a marker will confer antibiotic or herbicide resistance on the transformed plants, and selection of transformants can be accomplished by exposing the plants to appropriate concentrations of the antibiotic or herbicide. A novel selection marker using the D-form of amino acids and based on the fact that plants can only tolerate the L-form offers a fast, efficient and environmentally friendly selection system. An interesting feature of this selection system is that it enables both selection and counter-selection.

Subsequently, a plant may be regenerated, e.g. from single cells, callus tissue or leaf discs, as is standard in the art. Almost any plant can be entirely regenerated from cells, tissues and organs of the plant. Available techniques are reviewed in Vasil et al. 1984, Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol I, II and III, Laboratory Procedures.

After transformed plants are selected and grown to maturity, those plants showing an increase growth phenotype are identified. Additionally, to confirm that the phenotype is due to changes in expression levels or activity of the polypeptide or polynucleotide disclosed herein can be determined by analyzing mRNA expression using Northern blots, RT-PCR or microarrays, or protein expression using immunoblots or Western blots or gel shift assays.

Plant Species

In accordance with the invention, the present method produces a transgenic plant having an increased growth compared to its wild type plant from which it is derived. In an embodiment of the present method, the transgenic plant is a perennial plant, i.e. a plant that lives for more than two years. In a specific embodiment, the perennial plant is a woody plant which may be defined as a vascular plant that has a stem (or more than one stem) which is lignified to a high degree.

In a preferred embodiment, the woody plant is a hardwood plant, i.e. broad-leaved or angiosperm trees, which may be selected from the group consisting of acacia, eucalyptus, hornbeam, beech, mahogany, walnut, oak, ash, willow, hickory, birch, chestnut, poplar, alder, maple, sycamore, ginkgo, palm tree and sweet gum, Hardwood plants from the Salicaceae family, such as willow, poplar and aspen, including variants thereof, are of particular interest, as these two groups include fast-growing species of tree or woody shrub which are grown specifically to provide timber and bio-fuel for heating. Cellulosic grasses used for bioenergy like Switch grass and Red Canary Grass are also interesting.

In further embodiments, the woody plant is softwood or a conifer which may be selected from the group consisting of cypress, Douglas fir, fir, sequoia, hemlock, cedar, juniper, larch, pine, redwood, spruce and yew.

In useful embodiments, the woody plant is a fruit bearing plant which may be selected from the group consisting of apple, plum, pear, banana, orange, kiwi, lemon, cherry, grapevine and fig.

Other woody plants which may be useful in the present method may also be selected from the group consisting of cotton, bamboo and rubber plants.

DNA Construct

According to a second main aspect of the invention a DNA construct, such as a recombinant DNA construct, is provided comprising at least one sequence as described above. In particular, the recombinant DNA construct may comprise a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   a) a nucleotide sequence comprising a sequence selected from SEQ         ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6,         10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60,     -   b) a complementary nucleotide sequence of a nucleotide sequence         of a);     -   c) a sub-sequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of a) or         b);     -   d) a nucleic acid sequence being at least 60% identical to any         one of the sequences in a), b) and c); and     -   e) a nucleotide sequence which hybridizes under stringent         conditions to a nucleotide sequence of a), b) or c).

In selected embodiments of the invention the nucleic acid sequence in d) is at least 65% identical to any one of the sequences in a), b) and c), such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to any one of the sequences in a), b) and c).

In further embodiments relating to this aspect of the invention the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from those of SEQ ID NOs:18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60 or a complementary nucleotide sequence thereof.

Also in relation to this aspect of the invention it will be apparent that the sub-sequences or fragment in c) as described above comprises at least 15 nucleotides, such as at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, at least 25 nucleotides, e.g. at least 30 nucleotides, at least 35 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 45 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 55 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 65 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 75 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 85 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 95 nucleotides, or such as at least 100 nucleotides. In certain embodiments, the sub-sequences or fragment in c) as described above comprises at least about 150 nucleic acid residues, such as at least about 200, 250, 300, 330, 360, 375, 400, 425, 450, 460, 480, 500, 600, 700, 800 such as at least about 900 nucleotides or such as at least about 1 kb, 1.1 kb, 1.2 kb, 1.3 kb, 1.4 kb, 1.5 kb, 1.6 kb, 1.7 kb, 1.8 kb, 1.9 kb, 2 kb, 2.1 kb, 2.2 kb, 2.3 kb, 2.4 kb, 2.5 kb, 2.6 kb, 2.7 kb, 2.8 kb, 2.9 kb or such as at least about 3 kb.

Also, in accordance with the discussion above, the nucleotide sequence encodes a polypeptide comprising a conservatively substituted variant of a polypeptide of (a). Further, the nucleotide sequence comprises a silent substitution in a nucleotide sequence.

In additional embodiments of the pertaining to this aspect of the invention, the sub-sequences or fragments have at least 65% sequence identity to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a). such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a).

In particular embodiments, the sub-sequences or fragments in c) comprises the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60.

In further embodiments and in accordance with the description above, the recombinant DNA construct further comprising a constitutive, inducible, or tissue specific promoter operably linked to said nucleotide sequence. In particular, the recombinant DNA construct may further comprise a strong constitutive promoter in front of a transcribed cassette consisting of part of the target gene followed by a plant functional intron followed by the same part of the target gene in reverse orientation as described above. Another preferred type of recombinant DNA construct has a promoter driving the transcription of a DNA fragment from a target gene followed of an shorter sequence that are present in an inverted repeat, as also explained above.

In the presently exemplified embodiments of the invention the recombinant DNA construct comprises the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 47.

Transgenic Plants

A third aspect of the invention provides a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant polynucleotide (DNA construct) comprising a nucleotide sequence capable of altering in the plant the level of a gene product of at least one gene specifically expressed during wood formation phases. By analogy to the description above it will be understood that in one embodiment the at least one gene is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of said gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 5% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maxiumum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum maxiumum height growth rate (MMHGR);         and/or     -   b) a difference of 5% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 18% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 18% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maxiumum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization with N         84 g/l, PI 2 g/l, K 56 g/l, with a group of wild-type plants         grown under identical conditions;         wherein the maximum height growth rate is defined by calculating         the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive         height data points, a height growth rate value is calculated for         data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and         the maximum height growth rate value is finally selected from         the growth rate values for each plant.

According to a further embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the gene expressed during the wood formation phases is selected for conforming to the criteria that RNAi down-regulation of the gene in a group of 3-8 transgenic plants causes:

-   -   a) a difference of 8% or more in average final height (AFH) and         maximum final height (MFH) and average maximum height growth         rate (AMHGR) and maximum height growth rate (MMHGR); and/or     -   b) a difference of 8% or more in average final diameter (AFD)         and maximum final diameter (MFD) and average diameter growth         rate (ADGR) and maximum diameter coefficient (MDC); and/or     -   c) a difference of 22% or more in average final height (AFH)         and/or average final diameter (AFD) and/or average maxiumum         height growth rate (AMHGR) and/or average diameter growth rate         (ADGR); and/or     -   d) a difference of 22% or more in maximum final height (MFH)         and/or maximum final diameter (MFD) and/or maximum maximum         height growth rate (MMHGR) and/or maximum diameter coefficient         (MDC);         when comparing said group of transgenic plants grown for 8 weeks         in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 hours, a temperature         of 22° C./15° C. (day/night) and a weekly fertilization with N         84 g/l, PI 2 g/l, K 56 g/l, with a group of wild-type plants         grown under identical conditions;         wherein the maximum height growth rate is defined by calculating         the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive         height data points, a height growth rate value is calculated for         data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner and         the maximum height growth rate value is finally selected from         the growth rate values for each plant.

According to particular embodiments of the invention the level of a gene product of at least one gene comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   a) a nucleotide sequence from SEQ ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60;         such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54,         55, 56, 57, 58, 60.     -   b) a nucleotide sequence being at least 60% identical to a         nucleotide sequence from SEQ ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such         as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55,         56, 57, 58, 60,     -   c) a subsequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of a)         or b) has been altered relative to the level found in the         respective corresponding wild-type plant.

According to yet another embodiment of the invention, the transgenic plant comprises a recombinant polynucleotide (DNA construct) comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   d) a nucleotide sequence comprising a sequence selected from SEQ         ID NO:1-17, 50, 51, 54-58, 60; such as SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 5, 6,         10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60,     -   e) a complementary nucleotide sequence of a nucleotide sequence         of d);     -   f) a sub-sequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of d) or         e);     -   g) a nucleic acid sequence being at least 60% identical to any         one of the sequences in d), e) and f); and     -   h) a nucleotide sequence which hybridizes under stringent         conditions to a nucleotide sequence of d), e) or f).

In further embodiments of this aspect of the invention the nucleic acid sequence in c) or g) is at least 65% identical to any one of the sequences in a), b), d), e) or f), such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to any one of the sequences in a), b), d), e) or f).

As mentioned above the skilled person will realize that a variety of methods exist in the art for producing the nucleic acid sequences and polynucleotide constructs of the invention, e.g. by cloning techniques, assembly of fragments generated by solid phase synthesis. Again, the skilled person will understand, homologues of the described sequences may be isolated from other species, non-limiting examples of which include acacia, eucalyptus, hornbeam, beech, mahogany, walnut, oak, ash, hickory, birch, chestnut, alder, maple, sycamore, ginkgo, palm tree, sweet gum, cypress, Douglas fir, fir, sequoia, hemlock, cedar, juniper, larch, pine, redwood, spruce and yew, apple, plum, pear, banana, orange, kiwi, lemon, cherry, grapevine, fig, cotton, bamboo, switchgrass, red canary grass and rubber plants. Useful homologues of the described sequences may also be isolated from hardwood plants from the Salicaceae family, such as from willow, poplar or aspen.

In particular, the nucleotide sequence according to the invention comprises a sequence selected from those of SEQ ID NOs: 18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60, or a complementary nucleotide sequence thereof.

Again, it will be apparent that the sub-sequences or fragment in c) or f) as described above comprises at least 15 nucleotides, such as at least 16 nucleotides, at least 17 nucleotides, at least 18 nucleotides, at least 19 nucleotides, at least 20 nucleotides, at least 21 nucleotides, at least 22 nucleotides, at least 23 nucleotides, at least 24 nucleotides, at least 25 nucleotides, e.g. at least 30 nucleotides, at least 35 nucleotides, at least 40 nucleotides, at least 45 nucleotides, at least 50 nucleotides, at least 55 nucleotides, at least 60 nucleotides, at least 65 nucleotides, at least 70 nucleotides, at least 75 nucleotides, at least 80 nucleotides, at least 85 nucleotides, at least 90 nucleotides, at least 95 nucleotides, or such as at least 100 nucleotides. In certain embodiments, the sub-sequences or fragment in c) or f) as described above comprises at least about 150 nucleic acid residues, such as at least about 200, 250, 300, 330, 360, 375, 400, 425, 450, 460, 480, 500, 600, 700, 800 such as at least about 900 nucleotides or such as at least about 1 kb, 1.1 kb, 1.2 kb, 1.3 kb, 1.4 kb, 1.5 kb, 1.6 kb, 1.7 kb, 1.8 kb, 1.9 kb, 2 kb, 2.1 kb, 2.2 kb, 2.3 kb, 2.4 kb, 2.5 kb, 2.6 kb, 2.7 kb, 2.8 kb, 2.9 kb or such as at least about 3 kb.

In particular, the transgenic plant according to the present invention may comprise a recombinant DNA construct comprising a nucleotide sequence which relative to the particular sequences described, comprises conservative variations altering only one, or a few amino acids in the encoded polypeptide may also be provided and used according to the present invention. Accordingly, it is within the scope of the invention to provide a transgenic plant comprising a recombinant DNA construct comprising a nucleotide sequence which encodes a polypeptide comprising a conservatively substituted variant of a polypeptide of a) or d).

Accordingly, the present invention may also provide a recombinant DNA construct, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a silent substitution in a nucleotide sequence, that is, the recombinant DNA construct may comprise a sequence alteration that does not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide.

In certain further embodiments of the invention, the sub-sequences or fragments have at least 65% sequence identity to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a) or d), such as at least 70% identical, at least 75% identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least 87% identical, at least 90% identical, at least 95% identical, at least 97% identical, at least 98% identical, at least 99% identical, or at least 99.5% identical to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described above under item a) or d).

In the particular embodiments by which the present invention is exemplified the sub-sequences or fragments in c) comprise the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60.

In further embodiments the transgenic plant provided according to the invention comprises a recombinant polynucleotide construct which further comprises a constitutive, inducible, or tissue specific promoter operably linked to said nucleotide sequence.

In still further embodiments the recombinant polynucleotide construct further comprises a strong constitutive promoter in front of a transcribed cassette consisting of part of the target gene followed by a plant functional intron followed by the same part of the target gene in reverse orientation as described above. Another preferred type of recombinant polynucleotide construct has a promoter driving the transcription of a DNA fragment from a target gene followed of an shorter sequence that are present in an inverted repeat, as also explained above.

In the particular embodiments by which the present invention is exemplified, the transgenic plant comprises a recombinant polynucleotide construct in which the sub-sequences or fragments in c) comprise the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 18-38, 48, 49, 51-60; such as SEQ ID NO: 20, 29, 36, 37, 38, 48, 49, 51-60.

In a presently preferred embodiment of the invention, the transgenic plant according to the invention comprises a recombinant DNA construct comprising the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 47.

Plant Species

In accordance with the present invention, the transgenic plant may be a perennial plant which preferable is a woody plant or a woody species. In a useful embodiment, the woody plant is a hardwood plant which may be selected from the group consisting of acacia, eucalyptus, hornbeam, beech, mahogany, walnut, oak, ash, willow, hickory, birch, chestnut, poplar, alder, maple, sycamore, ginkgo, a palm tree and sweet gum. Hardwood plants from the Salicaceae family, such as willow, poplar and aspen including variants thereof, are of particular interest, as these two groups include fast-growing species of tree or woody shrub which are grown specifically to provide timber and bio-fuel for heating.

In further embodiments, the woody plant is a conifer which may be selected from the group consisting of cypress, Douglas fir, fir, sequoia, hemlock, cedar, juniper, larch, pine, redwood, spruce and yew.

In useful embodiments, the woody plant is a fruit bearing plant which may be selected from the group consisting of apple, plum, pear, banana, orange, kiwi, lemon, cherry, grapevine and fig.

Other woody plants which may be useful in the present method may also be selected from the group consisting of cotton, bamboo and rubber plants.

The present invention extends to any plant cell of the above transgenic plants obtained by the methods described herein, and to all plant parts, including harvestable parts of a plant, seeds and propagules thereof, and plant explant or plant tissue. The present invention also encompasses a plant, a part thereof, a plant cell or a plant progeny comprising a DNA construct according to the invention. The present invention extends further to encompass the progeny of a primary transformed or transfected cell, tissue, organ or whole plant that has been produced by any of the aforementioned methods, the only requirement being that progeny exhibit the same genotypic and/or phenotypic characteristic(s) as those produced in the parent by the methods according to the invention.

It should be noted that embodiments and features described in the context of one of the aspects of the present invention also apply to the other aspects of the invention.

All patent and non-patent references cited in the present application, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

The invention will now be described in further details in the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Identification of Useful Genes Involved in Wood Formation and Wood Growth

1.1 Introduction

In order to find and elucidate the function of genes involved in wood formation and wood growth, an extensive gene mining program was performed, resulting in the identification of genes useful in wood industrial applications.

1.2. Materials and Methods

1.2.1 Gene Selection

The first step in this gene mining program was to select some genes from a large gene pool in order to narrow the genes to be tested for their function. The gene selection method is based on gene expression patterns as described in Hertzberg et al. (2001) and Schrader et al. (2004).

In Hertzberg et al. (2001) a study of the developing secondary xylem of poplar is described. The secondary xylem of poplar is highly organised with easily recognized and distinct boundaries between the different developmental stages. Wood formation is initiated in the vascular cambium. Cambial derivatives develop into xylem cells through the processes of division, expansion, secondary wall formation, lignification and, finally, programmed cell death.

The large physical size of the vascular meristem in trees was used to obtain samples from defined developmental stages by tangential cryo sectioning. To determine the steady state mRNA levels at specific stages during the ontogeny of wood formation in Populus tremula x tremuloides (hybrid aspen) samples of 30 μm thick sections were obtained through the wood development region and subsequently the samples were analysed using a spotted cDNA-microarray consisting of 2995 unique ESTs from hybrid aspen (Hertzberg et al, 2001).

These samples were also subsequent re-hybridized to the spotted micro array as described in Schrader et al. (2004). From these experiments, genes with a clear specific expression during the different phases of wood formation where selected (see FIG. 1A). Basis for this is the assumption that genes usually have their function where they are expressed. Thus, genes that are specifically expressed during the different wood formation phases such as cell-division, cell expansion and cell commitment in the cambial zone, and genes expressed during the secondary cell wall formation in the maturation zone (see Wilson, et al., 1966 for definitions), are more likely to be important for wood formation processes than any randomly chosen gene. Like other plant meristems, the main function of the vascular cambium (FIG. 1A, zone A) is cell division and the initiation of differentiation. Sequences expressed primarily in the meristem and in the zone of early cell expansion (FIG. 1A, zone B) represent candidate genes involved in cell cycling, cell expansion, tip growth of fibres and biosynthesis of the primary cell wall. Zones A and B are also expected to express genes that regulate cell fate and cell identity. Cell expansion takes place in the meristem (zone A) and in zones B and C. Genes with an expression across the zones A, B and C (FIG. 1A) may therefore function in cell expansion. As soon as cell expansion is completed, the 35 secondary cell wall is deposited in all xylem cells (zone D). The majority of genes involved in the biosynthesis of the secondary cell wall, were predicted to be found in zones C (where the vessels initiate their secondary cell wall), D and E (FIG. 1A). Genes strongly up-regulated in zone E (FIG. 1A) include many wall-degrading enzymes required for cell wall sculpturing through final stages of the formation of pits and pores, or genes related to late phases of fibre maturation such as lignification and programmed cell death. Genes expressed in this zone also contains genes specifically involved in metabolism and transport in ray cells, which as opposed to the fibres, remain alive and maintain their metabolic activity.

A large number of different genes expressed during different stages of xylem development were selected for functional genomic analysis using RNAi down regulation in transgenic poplar plants. FIG. 2 shows examples of expression patterns for genes that were selected and tested for their function.

In addition to this selection, genes were selected based on the meristem array gene expression experiment described in Schrader et al. (2004). In this experiment only the cambial zone were sampled. However, the samples were thinner resulting in a higher resolution over the cambial meristem, i.e. one section corresponded to approximately three cell layers of the cambial zone, thus, providing near cell-specific resolution for the obtained expression profiles. From this experiment, genes with a peak within the cambial zone or having a steep change in expression over the cambial meristem (Schrader et al. 2004) were selected for functional genomic analysis using RNAi down regulation in transgenic poplar plants.

Subsequent to the selections based on expression patterns, the genes were screened based on gene annotations, and genes with apparently uninteresting gene annotations, such as ribosomal protein genes, were excluded. The use of careful selection of the genes to be functionally tested in a functional genomic program directed towards growth and wood properties is very beneficial in order to reduce cost and to search out to the interesting genes faster.

Although the selection of the genes, for which functions are analysed, are an important part of the discovery of genes with functions interesting for forest biotechnology in an economic efficient way, it is the actual testing of the gene function of the selected genes which is the crucial step for finding their use in industrial applications. Gene selection such as it is performed here is merely important in order to maximize the positive output of a functional genomics program (e.g. large scale testing of genes using mutants or transgenic plants/organisms) directed against certain properties/functions.

The result of the gene selection was 184 potential genes, 150 of these were finally functionally analysed, 17 genes of which were further selected for their involvement and use in changing and/or modifying the phenotype of the tree with regard to growth and improved wood chemistry. Examples of expression patterns from the 184 selected genes are shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3.

1.2.2 Cloning of the Selected Genes

Selected genes were subsequently cloned into a RNAi vector under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter (RNA interference vector, pK7GWIWG2(I)) using Gateway technology (Invitrogen USA). Two principal sets of cloning primers were used, one set was a universal primer pair binding to the vector and the poly-A tail, and the other set were gene-specific primers. The PCR product was first transferred into the pDONR vector (Invitrogen USA) and subsequently transferred into the destination vector pK7GWIWG2(I) according to manufacturers recommendations (Invitrogen USA). The sequences of the selected genes, their gene bank accession numbers and PCR primers etc. are listed in Table 1.1.

TABLE 1.1 Gene bank accession numbers, sequences and PCR primers etc. Name cloning Name cloning Forward primer Reverse primer Construct FW name FW sequence Rev name Rev sequence KR121 attB1-T12VN SEQ ID NO: 39 attB2-T7 SEQ ID NO: 43 KR125 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR129B attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR140 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR152 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR163 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR221 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR224 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR235 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR240 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR242 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR292 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR313 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR318 attB1-T12VN attB2-T7 KR459 KR459FwAttB2 SEQ ID NO: 40 KR459ReAttB1 SEQ ID NO: 44 KR463 KR463FwAttB2 SEQ ID NO: 41 KR463ReAttB1 SEQ ID NO: 45 KR465 KR465FwAttB2 SEQ ID NO: 42 KR465ReAttB1 SEQ ID NO: 46 Sequence used for Construct RNAi construct: Full sequence KR121 SEQ ID NO: 18 SEQ ID NO: 1 KR125 SEQ ID NO: 19 SEQ ID NO: 2 KR129B SEQ ID NO: 20 SEQ ID NO: 3 KR140 SEQ ID NO: 21 SEQ ID NO: 4 KR152 SEQ ID NO: 22 SEQ ID NO: 5 KR163 SEQ ID NO: 23 SEQ ID NO: 6 SEQ ID NO: 24 KR221 SEQ ID NO: 25 SEQ ID NO: 7 KR224 SEQ ID NO: 26 SEQ ID NO: 8 KR235 SEQ ID NO: 27 SEQ ID NO: 9 SEQ ID NO: 28 KR240 SEQ ID NO: 29 SEQ ID NO: 10 KR242 SEQ ID NO: 30 SEQ ID NO: 11 KR292 SEQ ID NO: 31 SEQ ID NO: 12 KR313 SEQ ID NO: 32 SEQ ID NO: 13 SEQ ID NO: 33 KR318 SEQ ID NO: 34 SEQ ID NO: 14 SEQ ID NO: 35 KR459 SEQ ID NO: 36 SEQ ID NO: 15 KR463 SEQ ID NO: 37 SEQ ID NO: 16 KR465 SEQ ID NO: 38 SEQ ID NO: 17 Updated or Updated or complemented complemented full sequence used for sequence Construct New Seq ID No RNAi construct KR121 SEQ ID NO: 48 SEQ ID NO: 18 KR125 SEQ ID NO: 49 SEQ ID NO: 19 KR129B SEQ ID NO: 50 SEQ ID NO: 3 KR140 SEQ ID NO: 51 SEQ ID NO: 21 SEQ ID NO: 4 KR152 SEQ ID NO: 52 SEQ ID NO: 22 KR163 SEQ ID NO: 53 SEQ ID NO: 23 SEQ ID NO: 24 KR221 SEQ ID NO: 54 SEQ ID NO: 25 SEQ ID NO: 7 KR224 SEQ ID NO: 55 SEQ ID NO: 26 SEQ ID NO: 8 KR235 SEQ ID NO: 56 SEQ ID NO: 27 SEQ ID NO: 9 SEQ ID NO: 28 KR242 SEQ ID NO: 57 SEQ ID NO: 30 SEQ ID NO: 11 KR292 SEQ ID NO: 58 SEQ ID NO: 31 SEQ ID NO: 12 KR313 SEQ ID NO: 59 SEQ ID NO: 32 SEQ ID NO: 33 KR318 SEQ ID NO: 60 SEQ ID NO: 34 SEQ ID NO: 14 SEQ ID NO: 35

KR121

Further sequencing analysis of KR121 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:48. This new sequence complements SEQ ID NO:18 by adding about 28 bases in the five prime end and updating about 10 bases within the sequence.

KR125

Further sequencing analysis of KR125 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:49. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:19 by adding about 32 bases in the five prime end, updating about 10 bases within the sequence and adding another 881 bases of three prime sequence.

KR129B

SEQ ID NO:50 fully replace SEQ ID NO:3 because the wrong Gene Model sequence was given as full sequence.

KR140

Further sequencing analysis of KR140 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:51. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:21 by adding about 287 bases in the three prime end and it will also update SEQ ID NO:4 as the full sequence of KR140.

KR152

Further sequencing analysis of KR152 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:52. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:22 by updating 7 bases.

KR163

Further sequencing analysis of KR163 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:53. This sequence cover the whole cDNA where SEQ ID NO:23 and SEQ ID NO:24 cover the five and three prime part respectively. SEQ ID NO:53 is adding 351 bases in between the sequences. It is also adding about 46 bases in the five prime end and updating about 10 bases in the sequences.

KR221

Further sequencing analysis of KR221 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:54. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:25 and SEQ ID NO:7 by addition of about 11 bases in the five prime end and updating the sequence from the 500:th base up to the three prime end.

KR224

Further sequencing analysis of KR224 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:55. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:26 by addition of about 778 bases tree prime of the sequence and updating about 10 bases within the sequence. It will also update the SEQ ID NO:8 as the full sequence of 224.

KR235

Further sequencing analysis of KR235 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:56. This sequence cover the whole cDNA where SEQ ID NO:27 and SEQ ID NO:28 cover the five and three prime part respectively. SEQ ID NO:56 is adding 161 bases in between the sequences. It will also update the SEQ ID NO:9 as the full sequence of KR235.

KR242

Further sequencing analysis of KR242 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:57. This sequence complements the SEQ ID NO:30 and SEQ ID NO:11 by updates of about 30 bases in the sequence.

KR292

Further sequencing analysis of KR292 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:58. This sequence complements SEQ ID NO:31 and SEQ ID NO:12 by adding about 36 bases in the five prime end and updating about 20 bases within the sequence.

KR313

Further sequencing analysis of KR313 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:59. This sequence cover the whole cDNA where SEQ ID NO:32 and SEQ ID NO:33 cover the five and three prime part respectively. SEQ ID NO:59 is adding 84 bases in between the sequences and updating about 6 bases within the sequences.

KR318

Further sequencing analysis of KR318 resulted in new sequence, referred to as SEQ ID NO:60. This sequence fully replace SEQ ID NO:34, SEQ ID NO:35 and SEQ ID NO:14. The first presented sequences were wrong due to a clone mix up. The transgenes presented are based on the new SEQ ID NO:60.

1.2.3 Plant Transformation

CaMV 35S: Inverted repeat DNA constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium and subsequent into Hybrid aspen, Populus tremula L. x P. tremuloides Minch. Clone T89, hereafter called “poplar”, was transformed and regenerated essentially as described in Nilsson et al. (1992). Approximately 3-8 independent lines were generated for each construct. One such group of transgenic trees produced using one construct is hereafter called a “construction group”, e.g. different transgenic trees emanating from one construct. Each transgenic line within each construction group, e.g. KR555-2B KR555-3A, KR555-2B and so on, are different transformation events and therefore most probably have the recombinant DNA inserted into different locations in the plant genome. This makes the different lines within one construction group partly different. For example it is known that different transformation events will produce plants with different levels of gene down-regulation when using RNAi constructs of the type used here.

1.2.4 Plant Growth

The transgenic poplar lines were grown together with their wild type control (wt) trees, in a greenhouse under a photoperiod of 18 h and a temperature of 22° C./15° C. (day/night). The plants were fertilized weekly Weibulls Rika S NPK 7-1-5 diluted 1 to 100 (final concentrations NO3, 55 g/l; NH4, 29 g/l; P, 12 g/l; K, 56 g/l; Mg 7.2 g/l; S, 7.2 g/l; B, 0.18 g/l; Cu, 0.02 g/l; Fe, 0.84 g/l; Mn, 0.42 g/l; Mo, 0.03 g/l; Zn, 0.13 g/L). The plants were grown for 8-9 weeks before harvest. During this time their height and diameter was measured 1 to 2 times per week. A number of wild type trees (typically 15-25 trees) and a number of transgenic trees comprising several construction groups (typically 6-20 construction groups) were grown in parallel in the greenhouse under the same above conditions. All comparisons between the wild type trees and construction groups are made within each growth group.

1.2.5 Sampling

Two principal types of harvest and sampling were performed. One general type was for example for chemical analysis, wood morphological analysis, gene expression analysis, wood density analysis and metabolomics analysis. And another type for dry weight measurements of bark, wood, leafs and roots.

1.2.6 Selection of Construction Groups

In the first round of growth for each group of trees with a specific gene down regulated using RNAi, i.e. a construction group, a number of the following analyses were performed: Growth measurements. These data were analysed in order to single out the Construction Groups that showed a phenotypic variation compared to wild type control trees.

Based on the growth data a number of analyses and factors were performed and calculated in order to select the construction groups and thereby the genes which are possible to use for altering growth characters. Selection criteria's and methods were as described below.

Growth Analysis

Growth During Exponential Phase

Under the above defined growth conditions, plants exhibit an exponential growth pattern (plant height) up to an approximate height of 80 cm or up to day 40 in the greenhouse. For each plant, data points of plant height within these bounds were used for fitting of an exponential function in the form of:

h(t)=h ₀ *e ^(at)

where h₀ is a constant (height at t=0) and a is defined as the rate of exponential growth.

Maximum Height Growth Rate

Another height growth rate measure (here named “Maximum height growth rate”) was defined as the slope of a linear function fitted over four consecutive height data points. A height growth rate value was calculated for data point 1-4, data point 2-5 etc. in a step-wise manner, see FIG. 4 for an example. A maximum growth rate defined as the maximum value, produced from step-wise linear regression analysis, for each plant was computed. The primary data for high Maximum height growth rate values from individual transformants in a construction group were checked so they were not based on bad values. From FIG. 4, showing an example of a height growth curve, it can be seen that the height growth rate increases during the first part of growth then the plants reach their maximum height growth and then the growth rate declines as the plants become larger. Because these phases have different timing in different plants and there are some noise added measuring the plants our above described Maximum height growth using rate method is very useful in calculating the maximum growth speed in these conditions for the different individual trees.

Diameter Growth Rate

Under the above defined growth conditions, stem width exhibit a comparatively linear increase over time. Linear regression on diameter data was used for estimating diameter growth.

d(t)=c*t+d ₀

where d₀ is the initial width and c is the rate of diameter growth (slope).

Final Height and Diameter

The final height and diameter were also used to select altered construction groups. These values take into account both the trees growth capacity and the trees ability to start their growth when transferred from tissue culture into soil and placed in a greenhouse.

Selection Parameters

Construction groups that showed a significant or pronounced increase compared to the wild type population in the above mentioned growth parameters, i.e. diameter growth rate, maximum height growth rate, final height and final diameter, were scored as Construction Groups that are altered in their growth properties, and therefore, the corresponding genes can be used to alter these properties. The selection criteria's are stated below. Two different selection levels were used, one basic level and one for constructs giving growth phenotypes of extra interest.

Growth Difference Selection Criteria

In Table 1.2 the abbreviations used for the phenotypes used for the growth selection criteria are listed.

TABLE 1.2 Abbreviations for the phenotypes AFH Average final height of the wild type population and each Construction group population AFD average final diameter of the wild type population and each Construction group population AMHG Raverage Maximum height growth rate of the wild type population and each Construction group population ADGR Average diameter coefficient of the wild type population and each Construction group population MFH Maximum final height of the wild type population and each Construction group population MFD Maximum final diameter of the wild type population and each Construction group population MMHGR Maximum of Maximum height growth rate of the wild type population and each Construction group population MDC Maximum diameter coefficient of the wild type population and each Construction group population

The growth difference selection criteria are as follows:

-   -   1. If construction group AFH, MFH, AMHGR and MMHGR are at least         5% (or 8% in a second higher level) greater than corresponding         wild type group AFH, MFH, AMHGR and MMHGR, or     -   2. If construction group AFD, MFD, ADGR and MDC are at least 5%         (or 8% in a second higher level) greater than corresponding wild         type group AFD, MFD, ADGR and MDC, or     -   3. If construction group AFH, AFD, AMHGR or ADGR is at least 18%         (or 22% in the second higher level) greater than corresponding         wild type group AFH, AFD, AMHGR or ADGR, or     -   4. If construction group MFH, MFD, MMHGR or MDC is at least 18%         (or 22% in the second higher level) greater than corresponding         wild type group MFH, MFD, MMHGR or MDC

Running a large scale functional genomics program produces a certain amount of variation and uncertainty in the data produced. In this set up variation is produced from sources such as: that the different lines within an construction group have different amounts of down regulation resulting in that one to all tested lines within an construction group can show the phenotype; the variation in growth that occur during the experimental procedure due to small variations in plant status when transferring the plants from tissue culture to the greenhouse and variations based on different positions in the greenhouse during different time points during the growth cycle. These variations have to be dealt with when analysing the data. Based on these two different thresholds of increase 5% and 18% were used for selecting construction groups with increased growth. The selection criteria 1 and 2 uses an 5% increase, however this increase have to be present in all the phenotypes AFH, MFH, AMHGR and MMHGR corresponding to height growth or all the phenotypes AFD, MFD, ADGR and MDC corresponding to diameter growth. In the cases that the phenotype only can be seen in some or one of the plants and only in one phenotype class, an higher 18% increase were used to select positive construction groups in order not to select construction groups based on random variations (selection criteria's 3 and 4 selecting on average values and maximum individual values respectively). These numbers were checked against the wild type data. The 18% level for filter 3 and 4 were passed by no wild type plants, e.g. no wild type plant in any of the growth groups had an more than a 18% higher value than the wild type with the 2^(nd) highest value in any of the used growth phenotypes. The 5% level used for filter 1 and 2 produce less than 4% false positives (1 in 25 genes), e.g. randomly removing 5 wild type plants from the wild type control population and testing them for passing filters 1 and 2 and performing that for all the growth groups and repeating this 10 times gives that in 4% of the times the removed wild type plants will pass the filter. This is a very tough method to estimate the false positives, because the wild type control group is lowered with 5 plants. For the higher value 8% used for the genes of extra interest, this produce less than 1.5% false positives.

Construction groups meeting one or more of these criteria were selected.

Internod Length Measurement

All the nodes from the FDL node and included 60 cm downwards the stem was counted and the average internode length was calculated.

1.3 Results

The growth raw data for the specified construction group and the corresponding wild type group are shown in tables 1.3 to 1.20. Table rows contain height and diameter measurements of individuals of specified construction group (named “KR”) and corresponding wild type group (named “T89”). Time of measurement, i.e. no. of days in greenhouse, is shown in the table header.

Construction Group KR221

Construct KR221 corresponding to EST A013P18U gene bank number AI162169. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the D zone. This construct induces increased growth. The construction group population shows a 21% average increase in diameter growth rate compared to the wt population. Construction group meets Growth Filter criterion (3).

TABLE 1.3 Growth data for KR221 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 18 21 26 29 33 43 56 26 29 33 56 KR221rp1-4B-1 13 18 26 33 47 84 115 3.5 4.0 4.8 8.7 KR221rp1-4B-2 16 22 33 41 54 93 120 3.8 4.4 5.4 9.4 KR221rp1-4B-3 18 23 33 44 59 104 137 3.7 4.9 5.9 9.1 T89-1 26 33 46 57 71 109 139 4.1 4.9 5.8 8.9 T89-2 28 36 48 58 75 113 141 5.1 6.3 7.1 9.5 T89-3 25 32 45 55 70 110 136 5.2 5.5 7.1 9.6 T89-4 23 29 41 52 67 110 142 4.4 4.9 5.9 9.1 T89-5 27 37 48 59 74 120 150 4.9 5.7 6.9 9.4 T89-6 25 32 45 54 67 107 137 4.7 5.9 5.9 9.2 T89-7 27 34 47 58 72 113 140 4.4 5.3 6.2 9.5 T89-8 27 34 45 55 70 111 140 5.0 6.1 6.7 10.2 T89-9 24 30 42 51 67 110 138 4.1 5.0 6.6 9.5 T89-10 24 31 42 51 66 104 135 4.6 5.5 6.1 8.5 T89-11 23 30 43 55 70 110 139 4.4 5.2 6.3 8.6 T89-12 26 32 43 53 68 105 132 5.4 6.3 7.2 10.1 T89-13 25 32 44 53 68 106 137 4.8 6.0 6.6 9.5 T89-14 26 31 45 55 71 108 134 4.4 5.1 6.3 8.7 T89-15 27 35 49 58 73 118 148 4.9 5.6 6.5 9.6 T89-16 27 35 47 57 70 109 134 5.8 5.9 6.9 8.8 T89-17 21 27 39 50 64 105 136 3.7 5.6 5.9 8.7 T89-18 20 29 38 48 63 108 137 4.2 5.2 6.3 9.5 T89-19 23 29 40 48 65 106 137 4.2 5.7 5.9 9.3 T89-20 17 23 35 44 59 95 125 3.7 4.2 4.8 7.6 T89-22 25 32 44 53 67 106 133 4.0 5.9 6.2 9.0 T89-23 24 31 45 56 71 111 139 4.7 6.1 7.0 9.8

Construction Group KR224

Construct KR224 corresponding to EST A013P46U gene bank number A1162193. This gene is selected from data from Schrader et al 2004, and has its highest expression in sample 8 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an increased final height compared to the wild types when comparing the tallest individuals (11%). The construction group also shows an 11% increase in maximum height growth rate compared to the wild types when comparing the fastest growing individuals. The construction group meets growth Filter criteria (1) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.4a Growth data for KR224 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR224-1A 28 31 39 42.5 52 61.5 74 82 N/A 117 120 KR224-1B 23 24.5 35 34.5 43 50.5 60 68  92 106 111 KR224-2A 31 36 45 49.5 61 72 87 95   126.5 140 147 KR224-4A 33 37.5 48 54 65 75 90 100 130 N/A 153 KR224-5B 28.5 34 42 47 57.5 66.5 79 87.5 114 125 128 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131   137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90  94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92  96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.4b Growth data for KR224 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR224-1A 3.0 3.7 5.1 6.5 N/A 9.5 9.7 KR224-1B 2.7 2.6 3.5 5.3 7.5 8.0 8.4 KR224-2A 3.5 3.8 5.4 6.9 8.7 N/A 10.3 KR224-4A 3.4 3.9 5.0 6.7 8.5 N/A 9.6 KR224-5B 3.5 3.6 5.0 6.9 9.6 9.7 10.6 T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3 T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0 T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR240

Construct KR240 corresponding to EST A018P19U gene bank number A1162476. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the C and D zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an increase in the diameter growth rate compared to the wild type controls of 20% when comparing the average values. The KR240 construction group meets Growth Filter criteria (3) and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.5 Growth data for KR240 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 18 26 33 39 47 53 65 33 39 47 53 59 65 KR240-1A-A 20 34 50 80 98 117 161 5.2 7.3 7.9 9.0 9.3 9.6 KR240-1A-B 18 31 44 75 92 111 151 4.5 5.8 6.5 6.8 7.5 7.7 KR240-2B 19 32 47 76 90 108 147 5.0 6.6 7.3 8.7 8.8 9.0 KR240-3B-A 17 29 39 66 79 95 127 4.7 6.5 6.9 8.2 9.8 10.1 KR240-5B-A 16 30 46 76 92 108 146 4.6 6.1 7.0 7.5 8.2 9.0 T89-133 23 37 51 84 103 121 156 4.7 6.7 7.7 8.4 9.1 9.7 T89-134 25 38 50 80 95 112 149 4.4 6.2 7.1 7.6 7.6 8.4 T89-135 17 29 43 71 86 104 140 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.6 9.1 9.1 T89-136 19 31 45 72 85 103 138 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.4 7.3 7.8 T89-137 22 37 52 82 96 112 151 5.0 6.5 7.3 7.8 N/A 10.0 T89-138 21 33 47 78 94 109 140 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.8 8.4 9.0 T89-139 24 39 56 92 108 124 159 4.8 5.7 6.3 7.0 7.6 8.4 T89-140 25 41 56 88 101 115 148 4.9 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.8 T89-141 17 30 45 77 87 104 132 5.0 5.3 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.2 T89-142 24 38 54 85 99 116 146 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.6 7.6 8.3 T89-143 24 40 56 89 107 122 155 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.8 7.3 8.4 T89-144 23 37 52 76 89 107 139 4.5 5.9 6.5 6.9 7.1 7.9 T89-146 27 43 58 84 99 116 153 4.6 6.0 6.7 7.4 7.8 8.5 T89-147 26 44 62 95 111 130 167 5.4 6.5 6.9 7.4 8.0 8.7 T89-148 21 32 47 77 91 109 146 4.2 5.4 6.1 6.6 6.9 7.8

Construction Group KR292

Construct KR292 corresponding to EST A041P18U gene bank number A1163398. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and has its highest expression in samples 6-8 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an increased final width compared to the wild types when comparing the widest individuals of 14%. The construction group also shows a 15% increase in diameter growth rate compared to the wild types when comparing the fastest growing individuals. This construct induces meets Growth Filter criteria (2) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.6 Growth data for KR292 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 19 21 29 35 42 49 53 21 29 35 42 53 KR292-1B 27 32 51 69 98 131 147 3.4 5.0 6.0 7.6 8.2 KR292-2B-A 33 39 61 85 117 145 158 4.1 6.1 7.5 9.8 11.4 KR292-2B-B 28 33 55 77 109 138 152 3.5 5.7 7.2 9.0 10.7 KR292-5A 32 37 60 82 112 138 153 4.3 6.0 7.3 8.7 10.4 T89-66 23 27 49 69 97 127 141 3.2 5.7 6.9 7.9 10.0 T89-67 34 39 61 83.5 116 144 159 4.1 5.4 6.7 8.0 9.7 T89-68 27 32 51 69 99 129 143 3.4 4.8 5.9 7.9 9.5 T89-69 35 40 61 81 N/A 136 153 3.6 5.4 6.8 N/A 9.0 T89-70 29 32 51 68 97 125 140 3.1 4.7 5.7 7.5 8.6 T89-71 29 44 55 74 107 135 148 3.4 4.9 6.6 7.6 9.0 T89-72 33 38 57 75 102 129 145 3.2 4.7 6.0 8.0 9.3 T89-73 34 40 59 78 106 132 149 3.5 5.7 6.2 8.2 9.5

Construction Group KR313

Construct KR313 corresponding to EST A047P40U gene bank number A1163745. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and has its highest expression in samples 8-10 in the B series, in the Hertzberg et al 2001 data the gene has its highest expression in the B sample. This construct induces increased growth. This construct induces a 20% increased maximum height growth speed. This construct meets Growth Filter criterion (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.7 Growth data for KR313 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 19 21 29 35 42 49 53 21 29 35 42 53 KR313-2B 29 35 53 73 103 131 147 3.2 4.5 6.1 6.9 8.3 KR313-6B 20 25 49 70 107 142 161 2.8 3.8 5.3 7.7 9.9 KR313-7B 26 31 54 75 105 136 151 3.8 5.0 6.2 7.9 10.1 KR313-9A 15 19 37 56 84 110 126 2.2 3.2 4.5 6.6 8.6 KR313-9B 21 26 48 68 98 134 151 3.1 4.0 5.4 7.7 9.5 T89-66 23 27 49 69 97 127 141 3.2 5.7 6.9 7.9 10.0 T89-67 34 39 61 83.5 116 144 159 4.1 5.4 6.7 8.0 9.7 T89-68 27 32 51 69 99 129 143 3.4 4.8 5.9 7.9 9.5 T89-69 35 40 61 81 N/A 136 153 3.6 5.4 6.8 N/A 9.0 T89-70 29 32 51 68 97 125 140 3.1 4.7 5.7 7.5 8.6 T89-71 29 44 55 74 107 135 148 3.4 4.9 6.6 7.6 9.0 T89-72 33 38 57 75 102 129 145 3.2 4.7 6.0 8.0 9.3

Construction Group KR459

Construct KR459 corresponding to EST UB12CPE03 gene bank number BU820650. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and has its highest expression in sample 6 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construct induces increased height growth, the final height is 24% and the maximum height growth rate is 23% larger comparing the fastest growing individuals from the construction group and wild type control group. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.8 Growth data for KR459 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 21 28 34 40 49 61 21 28 34 40 49 61 KR459-3B 27 42 59 79 128 146 3.1 4.3 6.4 7.9 9.9 10.9 KR459-4B 28 42 58 78 127 160 3.3 4.6 6.3 7.0 8.9 10.5 KR459-5B 25 40 57 76 125 158 3.3 4.1 6.4 7.8 9.3 10.5 KR459-6A 31 48 72 104 167 207 3.2 4.6 6.6 8.3 10.5 11.0 KR459-7A 28 42 62 83 136 170 3.1 4.5 6.4 7.9 9.3 10.8 T89-1 26 39 56 74 120 150 3.3 3.7 6.7 7.5 9.7 11.4 T89-2 24 40 62 85 132 159 3.0 4.4 6.9 7.9 10.4 11.5 T89-3 24 37 54 75 127 158 2.8 3.7 6.4 7.1 8.9 10.3 T89-4 24 37 54 79 126 151 2.9 4.0 6.0 7.2 9.4 11.2 T89-5 20 34 52 76 125 155 2.8 3.5 6.0 7.2 9.6 11.0 T89-6 26 40 56 76 121 149 3.2 3.8 6.2 7.9 10.3 11.4 T89-7 25 40 60 86 137 167 3.0 4.8 6.1 7.6 9.7 10.3 T89-8 26 41 59 81 129 150 3.3 4.5 6.9 8.1 10.7 11.9 T89-9 26 39 56 78 129 160 3.2 4.4 6.3 7.9 10.2 10.8 T89-10 26 39 58 84 134 166 2.8 4.1 5.8 7.5 9.2 9.7

Construction Group KR463

Construct KR463 corresponding to EST UB24CPA08 gene bank number CK106533. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and has its highest expression in sample 6 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an 18% increase in the average diameter growth rate compared to the wild type control trees. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (3) and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.9 Growth data for KR463 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 18 26 33 39 47 53 65 33 39 47 53 59 65 KR463-1A 22 35 49 79 93 110 143 2.9 6.3 5.9 6.6 7.6 8.7 KR463-2A 23 35 50 78 92 107 148 4.2 5.4 5.8 6.6 6.9 7.5 KR463-2B 23 37 52 83 99 115 150 5.1 6.4 6.7 7.4 8.4 9.1 KR463-4A 24 40 56 N/A 108 129 163 5.2 N/A 8.0 9.0 9.8 10.6 KR463-4B 23 38 54 81 95 112 152 4.6 6.4 6.8 7.6 7.9 8.3 T89-133 23 37 51 84 103 121 156 4.7 6.7 7.7 8.4 9.1 9.7 T89-134 25 38 50 80 95 112 149 4.4 6.2 7.1 7.6 7.6 8.4 T89-135 17 29 43 71 86 104 140 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.6 9.1 9.1 T89-136 19 31 45 72 85 103 138 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.4 7.3 7.8 T89-137 22 37 52 82 96 112 151 5.0 6.5 7.3 7.8 N/A 10.0 T89-138 21 33 47 78 94 109 140 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.8 8.4 9.0 T89-139 24 39 56 92 108 124 159 4.8 5.7 6.3 7.0 7.6 8.4 T89-140 25 41 56 88 101 115 148 4.9 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.8 T89-141 17 30 45 77 87 104 132 5.0 5.3 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.2 T89-142 24 38 54 85 99 116 146 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.6 7.6 8.3 T89-143 24 40 56 89 107 122 155 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.8 7.3 8.4 T89-144 23 37 52 76 89 107 139 4.5 5.9 6.5 6.9 7.1 7.9 T89-146 27 43 58 84 99 116 153 4.6 6.0 6.7 7.4 7.8 8.5 T89-147 26 44 62 95 111 130 167 5.4 6.5 6.9 7.4 8.0 8.7 T89-148 21 32 47 77 91 109 146 4.2 5.4 6.1 6.6 6.9 7.8

Construction Group KR465

Construct KR465 corresponding to EST UB29DPE02 gene bank number CK106678. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and is highest expression in sample 9 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows a 23% increase in the diameter growth rate. This construct meets Growth Filter criterion (3) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.10 Growth data for KR465 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 18 26 33 39 47 53 65 33 39 47 53 59 65 KR465-1A 13 28 47 81 98 119 158 3.9 5.3 6.2 7.5 8.0 9.3 KR465-1B 20 29 40 69 84 102 143 3.2 4.7 5.6 6.4 7.4 7.7 KR465-2A-B 10 22 36 N/A 88 107 147 4.0 N/A 6.3 7.2 7.7 8.3 KR465-2B 22 33 50 80 94 109 140 4.2 5.4 5.8 6.1 6.8 7.1 KR465-3A 26 41 57 93 107 122 154 4.6 5.6 6.4 7.6 7.7 8.2 KR465-4B-B 16 30 47 83 100 118 162 4.0 6.0 6.9 7.9 9.2 9.3 T89-133 23 37 51 84 103 121 156 4.7 6.7 7.7 8.4 9.1 9.7 T89-134 25 38 50 80 95 112 149 4.4 6.2 7.1 7.6 7.6 8.4 T89-135 17 29 43 71 86 104 140 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.6 9.1 9.1 T89-136 19 31 45 72 85 103 138 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.4 7.3 7.8 T89-137 22 37 52 82 96 112 151 5.0 6.5 7.3 7.8 N/A 10.0 T89-138 21 33 47 78 94 109 140 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.8 8.4 9.0 T89-139 24 39 56 92 108 124 159 4.8 5.7 6.3 7.0 7.6 8.4 T89-140 25 41 56 88 101 115 148 4.9 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.8 T89-141 17 30 45 77 87 104 132 5.0 5.3 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.2 T89-142 24 38 54 85 99 116 146 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.6 7.6 8.3 T89-143 24 40 56 89 107 122 155 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.8 7.3 8.4 T89-144 23 37 52 76 89 107 139 4.5 5.9 6.5 6.9 7.1 7.9 T89-146 27 43 58 84 99 116 153 4.6 6.0 6.7 7.4 7.8 8.5 T89-147 26 44 62 95 111 130 167 5.4 6.5 6.9 7.4 8.0 8.7 T89-148 21 32 47 77 91 109 146 4.2 5.4 6.1 6.6 6.9 7.8

Construction Group KR121

Construct KR121 corresponding to EST A043P46U gene bank number A1163516. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is down-regulated in the E zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an increased final height, final diameter, final maximum height growth rate and diameter growth rate of 14%, 16%, 9%, 15% respectively as compared to the wt control trees. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (2), and (3) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.11a Growth data for KR121 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR121-1A 35 40 50 56 67 76 91 100 130 145 150 KR121-1B 31 36 45 51 62 70 85 96.5 127 141 147.5 KR121-4B 31.5 37 47.5 53 63.5 73 90 100 N/A 135 140 KR121-5A 32 37 46 52 60 69 81 92 N/A 132.5 138 KR121-5B 29.5 34.5 44 49 60 70 85 93.5 N/A 132 137.5 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131 137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90 94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92 96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.11b Growth data for KR121 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR121-1A 3.6 4.1 5.2 7.1 9.0 N/A 10.1 KR121-1B 3.4 3.9 5.4 6.7 8.8 N/A 10.2 KR121-4B 3.6 4.3 6.0 8.2 N/A 12.0  12.0 KR121-5A 3.4 4.2 5.0 7.1 N/A 10.5  10.6 KR121-5B 3.2 4.0 5.5 7.4 N/A 10.1  10.4 T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3 T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0 T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR125

Construct KR125 corresponding to EST A045P41U gene bank number A1163624. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the D zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construct shows an increased final diameter and increased diameter growth rate of 12 and 6% respectively. This construct meets Growth Filter criterion (2) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.12 Growth data for KR125 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 25 35 40 42 50 57 35 42 50 57 KR125-4A-1 41.5 70 89 96 123 149 6.4 8.0 8.5 9.4 KR125-4A-2 40 67 86 95 128 153 5.7 6.6 7.8 9.1 KR125-5A-1 40.5 66 85 94 125 152 5.9 7.2 8.3 9.5 KR125-6A-1 37 64 83 90 118 143 5.4 7.1 8.3 9.1 KR125-6A-2 43 69 89 98 129 156 6.0 7.3 9.0 10.3 T89-44 35 60 79 85 115 139 4.5 5.4 5.9 6.9 T89-47 33 61 79 88 121 147 5.3 6.5 8.1 9.2 T89-49 33.5 57 76 85 115 143 5.3 6.4 8.1 9.3 T89-53 35 58 76 82 115 140 5.7 6.8 7.3 8.7 T89-57 33 55 71 78 107 137 5.0 6.6 7.3 8.0 T89-58E-1 28 50 62 68 92 120 4.6 5.8 7.5 7.4 T89-58E-2 28 51 71 79 113 139 5.0 6.9 7.5 8.5 T89-59E-1 26.5 51.5 71 78 108 138 4.8 6.5 7.9 8.4 T89-60E-1 31.5 56 76 84 114 137 5.2 6.6 8.0 8.9 T89-60E-2 34 57 75 83 110 134 5.4 7.0 8.4 9.5 T89-61E-1 27 48 65 72 102 133 4.4 5.6 7.0 6.9 T89-61E-2 29 52 70 80 111 139 5.0 6.2 7.5 8.4 T89-62 30 55 72 79 112 140 5.2 6.4 7.7 8.9 T89-63 30 55 72 80 110 133 5.4 6.3 6.8 8.7 T89-64 34 59 77 85 113 139 5.2 6.8 7.4 8.5 T89-65 36 64 82 90 120 148 5.9 7.2 8.9 9.8

Construction Group KR140

Construct KR140 corresponding to EST A061P49U gene bank number A1164435. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the D zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construct induces increased height growth, the maximum height growth rate is 12% larger comparing the average of the construction group and wild type control group. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (1) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.13a Growth data for KR140 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR140-1A 34 37.5 49 54 66 N/A 91.5 100 130 145 151 KR140-2A 26.5 30 38 44 54 64 78 87 117 132 139 KR140-4A 20 22 30 35 44 52 64.5 73 102 116 122.5 KR140-5A 15 18.5 23 27 36.5 44 54 62.5  89 101 107 KR140-5B 35 40 49 55 66.5 74 89 99   127.5 142 149 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131 137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90 94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92 96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.13b Growth data for KR140 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR140-1A 4.0 4.5 5.7 6.9 8.8 N/A 10.0 KR140-2A 2.7 3.3 4.8 6.0 7.9 N/A 8.8 KR140-4A 2.8 3.2 4.3 6.0 7.9 N/A 9.2 KR140-5A 1.6 2.0 3.1 4.5 6.7 N/A 7.7 KR140-5B 3.7 4.3 5.4 7.5 9.2 N/A 10.1 T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3 T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0 T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR152

Construct KR152 corresponding to EST A077P51U gene bank number A1165178. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is down-regulated in the E zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construct induces increased height growth, the final height is 10% and the maximum height growth rate is 11% larger comparing the average of the construction group and wild type control group. This construct induct meets Growth Filter criteria (1) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.14a Growth data for KR152 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR152-1B 26 30 37.5 42.5 54 63 76 87 117 135 137 KR152-2B 24 28.5 38 43 53 61.5 74 82 112 126 130 KR152-3B 32.5 38 48 54 60 73 87 93 N/A 91 N/A KR152-4A 28.5 33 41 45 53.5 64 76 85 N/A 124 137 KR152-4B 29 N/A 42 46 58 68 81 89.5 117 132 136 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131   137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90  94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92  96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.14b Growth data for KR152 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR152-1B 3.0 3.5 4.8 6.1 8.0 N/A 9.4 KR152-2B 2.9 3.3 4.7 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.6 KR152-3B 3.8 4.1 5.7 7.5 N/A N/A N/A KR152-4A 3.1 4.1 5.3 6.9 N/A 9.9 9.4 KR152-4B N/A 3.5 5.0 6.4 8.4 N/A 10.0  T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3  T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0  T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR163

Construct KR163 corresponding to EST A086P08U gene bank number A1165576. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the C zone. This construct induces increased growth. This construct gave an increased diameter growth rate of up to 30% compared to the wild types when comparing the fastest growing individuals. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (2) and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.16a Growth data for KR163 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR163-1A 25 28 35 40 48 56 66 74  96 108 112 KR163-1B 25 29.5 36.5 41.5 50 59 71 80 N/A 120 127.5 KR163-2B 25.5 30.5 41 44.5 54 64 70 86.5 117 130 136 KR163-3A 21.5 26 34 39 48.5 56 68.5 77 107 126 128 KR163-3B 28.5 33 42 47.5 60 66.5 80 89 N/A 132 136 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131 137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90 94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92 96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.16b Growth data for KR163 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR163-1A 3.1 3.4 4.6 6.3 8.5 9.5 9.5 KR163-1B 2.6 3.3 4.4 6.1 N/A 8.9 8.8 KR163-2B 3.0 3.2 5.1 6.4 9.0 N/A 9.8 KR163-3A 2.7 3.1 4.7 6.2 7.4 N/A 8.1 KR163-3B 3.7 3.4 4.9 6.7 N/A 12.7  13.0  T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3  T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0  T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR235

Construct KR235 corresponding to EST A017P24U gene bank number A1162414. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the D and E zones. This construct induces increased growth. This construct gave an increased maximum height growth rate of up to 17% compared to the wild types when comparing the fastest growing individuals. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (1), and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.17 Growth data for KR235 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 18 26 33 39 47 53 65 33 39 47 53 59 65 KR235-1A 22 37 51 83 99 118 146 4.7 5.9 6.3 7.0 7.1 7.8 KR235-3A 23 38 53 87 103 118 152 4.4 5.4 6.0 6.3 6.4 7.1 KR235-3B 25 44 59 93 111 131 169 5.1 6.5 6.9 7.7 7.9 8.8 KR235-4B-A 28 45 68 109 126 150 197 4.8 6.4 7.3 7.8 N/A 9.6 KR235-6A 25 41 58 82 98 118 158 4.5 5.8 6.3 6.9 7.7 8.6 T89-133 23 37 51 84 103 121 156 4.7 6.7 7.7 8.4 9.1 9.7 T89-134 25 38 50 80 95 112 149 4.4 6.2 7.1 7.6 7.6 8.4 T89-135 17 29 43 71 86 104 140 4.8 6.6 7.7 8.6 9.1 9.1 T89-136 19 31 45 72 85 103 138 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.4 7.3 7.8 T89-137 22 37 52 82 96 112 151 5.0 6.5 7.3 7.8 N/A 10.0 T89-138 21 33 47 78 94 109 140 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.8 8.4 9.0 T89-139 24 39 56 92 108 124 159 4.8 5.7 6.3 7.0 7.6 8.4 T89-140 25 41 56 88 101 115 148 4.9 6.0 6.0 6.8 7.0 7.8 T89-141 17 30 45 77 87 104 132 5.0 5.3 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.2 T89-142 24 38 54 85 99 116 146 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.6 7.6 8.3 T89-143 24 40 56 89 107 122 155 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.8 7.3 8.4 T89-144 23 37 52 76 89 107 139 4.5 5.9 6.5 6.9 7.1 7.9 T89-146 27 43 58 84 99 116 153 4.6 6.0 6.7 7.4 7.8 8.5 T89-147 26 44 62 95 111 130 167 5.4 6.5 6.9 7.4 8.0 8.7 T89-148 21 32 47 77 91 109 146 4.2 5.4 6.1 6.6 6.9 7.8

Construction Group KR242

Construct KR242 corresponding to EST A018P65U gene bank number A1162510. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and is up-regulated in samples 8-10 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows both increased height growth (up to 16% increased height when comparing the tallest individuals from the construction group and the wt control plants) and increased diameter growth (with an 16% increased diameter growth rate when comparing the averages between construction group and control plants). This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (1), (3) and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.18a Growth data for KR242 Height (cm) Days in greenhouse 25 28 32 34 38 41 45 48 55 59 60 KR242-1A 34 39 48 53.5 63.5 73.5 86 95 125 134 139 KR242-1B 33 38 47 52.5 65 74 78 97 N/A 139 146 KR242-2B 37 42.5 53 59 72.5 85 100 110.5 140 155 160 KR242-3A 29 34 44 50 59.5 66.5 80 89.5 115 130 136 KR242-4A 31 36 45 51 62 71.5 86 95 N/A 132 136 KR242-4B 27 32 42 48 59 68 83 92 124 138 146 KR242-5A 31 35 44.5 50 60.5 70 85 93 124 140 146 KR242-5B 27 31.5 39 43 52 59.5 N/A 76 N/A 115 119 T89-23 28 34 42 47 55 63 76 83 N/A 82 N/A T89-24 29.5 33 42 47 55 65 75 83 108 120 125 T89-25 31 35 45 50.5 60 68.5 80 89 N/A 128 132 T89-26 28 32.5 41 46 56 65 79 88 115 126 132 T89-27 29.5 34.5 43 47 56 66 79 86 N/A 127.5 132 T89-28 28.5 33 42 46.5 56 64 76 86 N/A 125 130 T89-29 31 35 42 49 57.5 67 80 89 118 131   137.5 T89-30 26 29.5 38 43 52 58 70.5 78 N/A 116 120 T89-31 25.5 31 38.5 43.5 53.5 62 74 82 N/A 123 128 T89-32 28 33.5 41 47 56 64 78 87 113 128 134 T89-33 27.5 29.5 37 42 50 56 67 73 N/A 72 N/A T89-34 29.5 34 43 47 56 66 73 81.5 112 123.5 129 T89-35 16 19.5 25 28 35.5 42 52 58  80 90  94 T89-36 25 30 36 44 53 62.5 74 82.5 110 124 129 T89-37 16 19 27 30.5 38 45 53 58  80 92  96 T89-38 24 29 37 41 51 60 73.5 81 108 122 129 T89-39 26 30 40 45 55 64 79 88 116 130 137 T89-40 28 32 39.5 44 52.5 61 73 81   108.5 124 129 T89-41 23 28 35 40.5 49 55 68 76 103 117 122

TABLE 1.18b Growth data for KR242 Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 28 32 38 45 55 59 60 KR242-1A 3.3 4.0 5.6 7.8 9.5 11.2  11.2 KR242-1B 3.9 4.2 5.4 8.1 N/A N/A 10.4 KR242-2B 3.8 4.2 5.6 7.5 9.4 N/A 10.8 KR242-3A 3.2 4.0 5.0 8.0 10.1  10.8  11.1 KR242-4A 3.5 4.1 5.7 7.9 N/A 11.0  11.2 KR242-4B 3.1 3.4 4.6 6.3 8.9 N/A 9.3 KR242-5A 3.1 3.7 4.5 6.3 8.7 N/A 9.8 KR242-5B 3.2 3.4 5.2 N/A N/A 10.2  10.7 T89-23 3.2 3.6 5.2 6.8 N/A N/A N/A T89-24 3.4 3.9 5.3 7.4 9.3 10.4  10.3 T89-25 3.6 4.3 5.4 6.5 N/A 9.3 9.9 T89-26 2.9 3.1 4.2 6.0 7.7 N/A 9.1 T89-27 3.6 4.0 5.2 7.1 N/A 9.2 9.5 T89-28 3.6 3.8 5.1 6.9 N/A 9.7 9.5 T89-29 3.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 8.2 9.5 8.4 T89-30 3.1 3.1 4.9 6.8 N/A 8.9 8.7 T89-31 3.1 3.5 4.7 6.0 N/A N/A 8.7 T89-32 3.2 3.5 4.9 6.6 8.6 N/A 9.1 T89-33 3.1 3.1 4.1 6.2 N/A N/A N/A T89-34 3.2 3.8 5.0 6.0 9.3 10.3  11.0 T89-35 1.8 1.9 2.9 4.3 6.2 7.0 7.5 T89-36 3.1 3.4 4.7 6.4 8.1 N/A 9.6 T89-37 2.0 2.5 4.1 6.0 7.8 9.1 9.0 T89-38 2.8 3.3 4.4 6.4 7.6 N/A 8.5 T89-39 3.0 3.4 4.3 6.5 8.0 N/A 9.4 T89-40 3.1 3.3 4.5 5.8 7.9 N/A 8.6 T89-41 2.7 3.1 4.2 5.9 7.9 N/A 9.6

Construction Group KR318

Construction Group KR318

Construct KR318 corresponding to EST A050P08U gene bank number A1163860. This gene is selected from the Schrader et al 2004 data and is up-regulated in samples 6-9 in the B series. This construct induces increased growth. This construct gives both an increased height and increased diameter growth. When comparing the individuals with the highest values from the construction group and the wild type control group the increase in maximum height growth rate was 21% and the increase in diameter growth rate was 13%. This construct meets Growth Filter criteria (1), and (4) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.19 Growth data for KR318 Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 19 21 29 35 42 49 53 21 29 35 42 53 KR318-1B 30 35 62 85 114 139 150 3.6 5.4 6.5 8.0 11.1 KR318-3A-A 33 37 66 93.5 132 167 183 3.6 5.1 7.1 8.3 9.5 KR318-3A-B 28 33 57 81 112 138 149 3.0 4.5 5.9 6.2 7.5 KR318-4A 28 33 56 74.5 106 136 150 3.3 4.8 6.0 8.2 9.8 KR318-4B-B 30 35 57 79 108 138 153 3.4 4.9 6.0 7.2 8.6 T89-66 23 27 49 69 97 127 141 3.2 5.7 6.9 7.9 10.0 T89-67 34 39 61 83.5 116 144 159 4.1 5.4 6.7 8.0 9.7 T89-68 27 32 51 69 99 129 143 3.4 4.8 5.9 7.9 9.5 T89-69 35 40 61 81 N/A 136 153 3.6 5.4 6.8 N/A 9.0 T89-70 29 32 51 68 97 125 140 3.1 4.7 5.7 7.5 8.6 T89-71 29 44 55 74 107 135 148 3.4 4.9 6.6 7.6 9.0 T89-72 33 38 57 75 102 129 145 3.2 4.7 6.0 8.0 9.3 T89-73 34 40 59 78 106 132 149 3.5 5.7 6.2 8.2 9.5

Construction Group KR129B

Construct KR129 corresponding to EST A047P55U gene bank number AI163758. This gene is selected from the Hertzberg et al 2001 data and is up-regulated in the C and D zones. This construct induces increased growth. This construction group shows an increased height growth with an 14% increased final height and an 8% increased maximum height growth rate. This construct meets Growth Filter criterion (1) as shown in the below table 1.21.

TABLE 1.20 Growth data for KR129B Height (cm) Diameter (mm) Days in greenhouse 21 28 35 42 49 55 28 35 42 49 55 KR129B-2A 33 48 75 105 135 155 3.6 5.1 6.2 6.6 7.1 KR129B-2B 33 46 69 96 124 143 4.2 5.1 6.5 6.5 7.4 KR129B-3A 37 53 77 105 133 151 4.5 5.3 6.5 7.1 7.6 KR129B-3B 19 28 47 71 98 118 3.0 4.3 5.4 6.2 6.5 T89-89 10 13 25 45 64 77 N/A 4.9 4.3 4.4 5.7 T89-92 27 39 61 89 118 135 3.6 5.1 6.2 6.6 7.3 T89-93 23 33 51 75 102 120 3.0 4.1 4.9 6.0 6.7 T89-94 25 35 59 85 115 134 3.5 4.8 6.1 6.9 7.3 T89-95 25 32 49 72 96 115 2.8 4.0 5.0 5.3 5.9 T89-96 30 47 73 99 110 113 5.0 5.8 7.3 8.1 8.6 T89-97 27 36 58 86 115 135 3.4 4.3 5.4 6.2 6.9 T89-98 29 41 65 93 120 140 3.9 5.6 5.9 6.9 7.5 T89-99 28 39 62 89 115 136 3.4 4.8 5.9 6.3 7.1 T89-100 29 41 65 92 118 134 4.0 5.3 6.3 7.3 8.3 T89-101 24 37 57 81 110 124 3.6 4.8 6.1 6.9 7.7 T89-102 31 47 71 96 125 144 4.6 5.5 6.6 7.0 7.4

In the below Table 1.21 shows the ratios of height and diameter growth measures of specified construction group relative to corresponding wildtype group (e.g. average final height (AFH) ratio: AFH_(Construction) _(_) _(group)/AFH_(Wiltype) _(_) _(group)) Table 1.22 contain ratios of computed growth measures AFH, AFD, AMHGR, ADGR, MFH, MFD, MMHGR and MDC. (Declaration of growth measures described above).

TABLE 1.21 Overall results of selected constructs - for the overall phenotype “increased growth” Phenotypes Average Maximum MAXIMUM MAXIMUM Average Average HEIGHT Average Maximum Maximum HEIGHT Maximum Final Final GROWTH Diameter Final Final GROWTH Diameter Height Diameter rate Coefficient Height Diameter RATE Coefficient (KRmean/ (KRmean/ (KRmean/ (KRmean/ (KRmax/ (KRmax/ KRmax/ (KRmax/ WTmean) WTmean) WTmean) WTmean) WTmax) WTmax) WTmax WTmax) Construct AFH AFD AMHGR ADGR MFH MFD MMHGR MDC KR121 1.14 1.16 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.09 1.05 1.12 KR125 1.09 1.12 1.00 1.06 1.05 1.05 0.99 1.06 KR129B 1.14 0.98 1.08 0.98 1.08 0.88 1.07 0.84 KR140 1.09 1.00 1.12 0.98 1.10 0.92 1.07 0.85 KR152 1.10 1.05 1.11 1.06 1.11 0.91 1.08 0.93 KR162 1.09 1.07 1.09 1.08 1.01 1.03 1.02 1.06 KR163 1.02 1.07 1.09 1.13 0.99 1.18 1.09 1.30 KR221 0.90 0.98 0.97 1.21 0.91 0.92 0.99 1.09 KR224 1.07 1.05 1.05 0.97 1.11 0.96 1.11 0.94 KR235 1.11 0.99 1.11 0.97 1.18 0.96 1.17 0.96 KR240 0.99 1.07 0.99 1.20 0.96 1.01 0.92 1.15 KR242 1.12 1.15 1.10 1.16 1.16 1.02 1.10 1.05 KR292 1.04 1.09 1.04 1.09 0.99 1.14 1.04 1.15 KR313 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.10 1.01 1.01 1.20 1.15 KR318 1.07 1.00 1.06 1.01 1.15 1.11 1.21 1.13 KR459 1.07 0.98 1.05 0.94 1.24 0.92 1.23 0.92 KR463 1.02 1.04 1.02 1.18 0.98 1.06 1.05 1.16 KR465 1.02 0.98 1.10 1.23 0.97 0.93 1.03 1.13

1.4 Discussion

By using the right amount of data and information for the selection of genes to be functionally analysed in a functional genomics program, in the present case directed towards growth properties, allowed us to find a number of genes that can be utilized in modifying growth in plants, specifically trees.

Of all the gene tested in this program less than 18% passed the first level of selection and less than 9% passed the second level of the growth criteria's set up here for genes of extra interest. Construction groups passing the second level of the growth criteria's set up here for genes of extra interest are KR121, KR152, KR163, KR235, KR242, KR292, KR459 and KR465. Although this is only a smaller part of the genes selected to be tested, the numbers are high compared to what one would expect from a random choice of genes to be tested, showing the importance and utility for our kind of selection of genes to be tested.

The foregoing example also illustrate the following: when comparing phenotypes according to single criteria, such as height or diameter, one are able to record and select genes causing strong phenotypes such as the ones selected by growth criteria filters 3 and 4. However, comparing the phenotypes according to multiple criteria, such as average final height, maximum final height, average MAXIMUM HEIGHT GROWTH RATE, and maximum MAXIMUM HEIGHT GROWTH RATE reveals that the down-regulation of the expression of some genes has a surprisingly large effect of the overall growth characteristics. As illustrated, this has allowed the identification of a subset of genes, wherein down-regulation of their expression leads to a considerable effect on plant growth. Having identified this subset of genes provides a clear advance over the state of the art and has significantly facilitated the generation and selection of promising transformation events for generation of transgenic plants with improved phenotypic traits.

When producing commercial lines using any of the different ways possible to down regulate gene expression one could produce many lines with different methods and test those for the desired properties. This could be done because different down regulation levels of the trait gene will often give different results. This can be clearly seen in the data in this example. One would then select the most promising transformation events.

REFERENCES

-   1. Sterky et al. 1998 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998 (95),     13330-13335 -   2. Hertzberg et al. 2001 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2001 (98),     14372-14737, -   3. Schrader et al. 2005 (Plant Cell, (16), 2278-2292 -   4. White et al. 1999 (Science 1999 (286) 2187-2184 -   5. Aharoni et al. 2000 (Plant Cell 2000 (12) 647-662 -   6. Uggla et al. 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1996 (93),     9282-9286 -   7. Schena et al. 1995 Science 1995 (270) 467-470 -   8. Wilson, B. F., Wodzicki, T. J. and Zhaner, R. (1966), Forest     Science 12, pp 438-440 -   9. Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed.,     Cold Spring Harbor, -   10. Rognes T, 2001, Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 1647-1652, 1989. -   11. Smith T F and Waterman M S, 1981, Journal of Molecular Biology,     147, 195-197. -   12. H. Neurath and R. L. Hill, 1979, In, The Proteins, Academic     Press, New York. -   13. WO2004097024 -   14. U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,071 -   15. U.S. Pat. No. 5,543,508. -   16. U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020 -   17. U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,021. -   18. WO2006/078431 -   19. Slade and Knauf, Transgenic Res. 2005 April; 14(2):109-15 -   20. Henikoff, Till, and Comai, Plant Physiol. 2004 June;     135(2):630-6. -   21. Ichikawa et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; -   22. Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science 274: 982-985 -   23. WO 96/06166 -   24. WO 98/53057 -   25. Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997), Antisense Technology: A     Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University, Oxford, England. -   26. U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,065 -   27. U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,559, -   28. US Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0168707 A1 -   29. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/423,143 (see WO 98/53083), -   30. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/127,735 (see WO 99/53050) -   31. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/084,942 (see WO 99/61631), -   32. Brummel D. A. et al. Plant Journal 2003, 33, pages 793-800 -   33. Karimi, M. et al., Trends In plant Sciences, Vol 7 no 5 pp     193-195. -   34. Wesley S. V. et al., Plant Journal 2001, 27, pages 581-590. -   35. Vasil et al. 1984, Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of     Plants, Vol I, II and III, Laboratory Procedures -   36. Niu et al., Science 2006, vol 24, No. 11 pp 1420-1428) -   37. G. A Tuskan et al, Science vol 313 No. 5793, pages 1596-1604. 

1-51. (canceled)
 52. A method of producing a transgenic tree having an increased growth compared to its wild type when grown under identical conditions comprising suppressing expression in the plant the level of the gene product specifically expressed during wood formation phases encoded by a) the nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: 1-14, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54-58, and 60 or; b) a nucleotide sequence being at least 70% identical to the nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: 1-14, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54-58, and 60; wherein the expression is suppressed by RNA interference.
 53. The method according to claim 52, wherein said expression is suppressed by providing a recombinant DNA construct comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: c) the nucleotide sequence SEQ ID NO: 1-14, 16, 17, 50, 51, 54-58, and 60; d) a complementary nucleotide sequence of the nucleotide sequence of c); e) a sub-sequence or fragment of a nucleotide sequence of c) or d); f) a nucleic acid sequence being at least 70% identical to any one of the sequences in c), d) and e); and g) a nucleotide sequence which hybridizes under stringent conditions to a nucleotide sequence of c), d) or e).
 54. The method according to claim 52, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 18-35, 37, 38, 48, 49, and 51-60, or a complementary nucleotide sequence thereof.
 55. The method according to claim 52, wherein the nucleotide sequence of a) is selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID Nos: 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 17, 56, 57 and
 58. 56. The method according to claim 52, wherein the sub-sequence or fragment in c) comprises at least 15 nucleotides.
 57. The method according to claim 52, wherein the nucleotide sequence encodes a polypeptide comprising a conservatively substituted variant of a polypeptide of a).
 58. The method according to claim 52, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprises a silent substitution in a nucleotide sequence.
 59. The method according to claim 52, wherein the sub-sequence or fragment has at least 65% sequence identity to a conserved domain of a nucleotide sequence as described in claim 1 a).
 60. The method according to claim 52, wherein the sub-sequence or fragment in c) comprises the sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 18-35, 37, 38, 48, 49, and 51-60.
 61. The method according to claim 53, wherein the recombinant DNA construct further comprises a promoter selected from the group consisting of a constitutive promoter, an inducible promoter, and a tissue specific promoter, wherein the promoter is operably linked to said nucleotide sequence.
 62. The method according to claim 53, wherein the recombinant DNA construct further comprises a strong constitutive promoter in front of a transcribed cassette comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID Nos: 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 17, 56, 57 and 58, followed by a plant functional intron, and followed by the nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID Nos: 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 17, 56, 57 and 58 in reverse orientation.
 63. The method according to claim 53, further comprising the step of transforming regenerable cells of a plant with said recombinant DNA construct and regenerating a transgenic plant from said regenerable cell.
 64. The method according to claim 52, wherein the transgenic plant is a perennial plant.
 65. The method according to claim 64, wherein the perennial plant is a woody plant.
 66. The method according to claim 65, wherein the woody plant is a hardwood plant.
 67. The method according to claim 66, wherein the hardwood plant is selected from the group consisting of acacia, eucalyptus, hornbeam, beech, mahogany, walnut, oak, ash, willow, hickory, birch, chestnut, poplar, alder, maple, sycamore, ginkgo, a palm tree and sweet gum.
 68. The method according to claim 66, wherein the hardwood plant is a plant of the Salicaceae family, including variants thereof.
 69. The method according to claim 65, wherein the woody plant is a conifer.
 70. The method according to claim 69, wherein the conifer is selected from the group consisting of cypress, Douglas fir, fir, sequoia, hemlock, cedar, juniper, larch, pine, redwood, spruce and yew.
 71. The method according to claim 65, wherein the woody plant is a fruit bearing plant.
 72. The method according to claim 71, wherein the fruit bearing plant is selected from the group consisting of apple, plum, pear, banana, orange, kiwi, lemon, cherry, grapevine and fig.
 73. The method according to claim 65, wherein the woody plant is selected from the group consisting of cotton, bamboo and rubber plants. 